The Central Bank of Malaysia plans to provide clearer guidance on the use of stablecoins and tokenized deposits by the end of 2026.

Foresight News reports that the Central Bank of Malaysia stated that the testing will enable the central bank to assess the impact of stablecoins and tokenized deposits on monetary and financial stability, and provide a basis for policy directions in these specific areas. They plan to offer clearer guidance on the use of ringgit stablecoins and tokenized deposits by the end of 2026.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Kentucky removes HB380’s backdoor provisions; Bitcoin self-custody avoids a de facto ban

Kentucky successfully blocked Section 33 of HB380, which required hardware wallet manufacturers to provide a password reset mechanism. It was criticized as an indirect ban because it conflicts with the existing HB701 law’s protections for individuals’ right to independently control encrypted assets. After final revisions, the updated HB380 was submitted to the governor for signature, maintaining the state’s pro-Bitcoin policy.

MarketWhisper1h ago

UNI and AAVE are first in line! Analyst: The current draft crypto market law could severely damage the DeFi yield myth

10x Research warns that if the CLARITY Act is passed, it will ban stablecoin balance yield, potentially impacting DeFi protocols and related tokens. Returns would be funneled back to the traditional financial system, leading to reduced market competition, and many DeFi projects will face strict regulation.

CryptoCity2h ago

California’s Crypto Seizure Framework Under Fire As Criticism Resurfaces

California's SB822 allows the state to claim unresponsive residents' crypto assets after three years. Critics argue it's unfair and unconstitutional, but the state must notify owners before assets are seized, aiming to protect consumer rights.

Blockzeit3h ago

XRP Today’s News: Arizona Proposes Legislation to Include XRP as a Treasury Reserve Asset

The Arizona House Rules Committee unanimously passed the SB1649 bill, establishing a Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund that puts digital assets such as XRP under the management of the Department of the Treasury, and allows revenue to be generated through methods such as staking. If the bill passes, it will become the first U.S. state to officially recognize XRP as a fiscal reserve asset. XRP is currently trading at $1.28 and faces challenges from technical support and resistance.

MarketWhisper4h ago

Trump appoints acting Attorney General who holds BTC, raising ethical questions about crypto enforcement policy

The President of the United States, Donald Trump, appointed Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche as Acting Attorney General, and dissolved the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team, issuing a memorandum to halt regulatory enforcement against the crypto industry. When Blanche signed this memorandum, he still held crypto assets, which allegedly violated ethical standards and sparked legal disputes; whether transferring his assets into his family’s name can eliminate the conflict of interest remains controversial.

MarketWhisper5h ago

CFTC sues in 3 states to reclaim jurisdiction over prediction markets, as a U.S. conflict landscape begins to take shape

The Trump administration has recently intervened in a lawsuit involving the CFTC and the regulators of gambling in three states, challenging the states’ authority to regulate prediction markets. The CFTC argues that, under the Commodity Exchange Act, it has exclusive jurisdiction over these markets, and accuses the states of overstepping their authority in an attempt to change the nature of the wagering event contracts. This lawsuit reflects regulatory actions by 11 states regarding prediction markets, each facing different legal challenges. If a federal court sides with the CFTC, it will help provide legal protection for prediction markets; otherwise, it will increase operational uncertainty.

MarketWhisper5h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments