POOL

Pool Corp Price

Closed
POOL
$214,94
+$0,94(+%0,43)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-12 08:22 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-12 08:22, Pool Corp (POOL) is priced at $214,94, with a total market cap of $7,90B, a P/E ratio of 20,90, and a dividend yield of %2,32. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $211,67 and $216,16. The current price is %1,54 above the day's low and %0,56 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 472,69K. Over the past 52 weeks, POOL has traded between $195,50 to $216,16, and the current price is -%0,56 away from the 52-week high.

POOL Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$213,51
Market Cap$7,90B
Volume472,69K
P/E Ratio20,90
Dividend Yield (TTM)%2,32
Dividend Amount$1,25
Diluted EPS (TTM)11,04
Net Income (FY)$406,40M
Revenue (FY)$5,28B
Earnings Date2026-04-23
EPS Estimate1,34
Revenue Estimate$1,09B
Shares Outstanding37,02M
Beta (1Y)1.262
Ex-Dividend Date2026-03-12
Dividend Payment Date2026-03-26

About POOL

Pool Corporation distributes swimming pool supplies, equipment, and related leisure products in the United States and internationally. The company offers maintenance products, including chemicals, supplies, and pool accessories; repair and replacement parts for pool equipment, such as cleaners, filters, heaters, pumps, and lights; fiberglass pools, and hot tubs and packaged pool kits comprising walls, liners, braces, and coping for in-ground and above-ground pools; pool equipment and components for new pool construction and the remodeling of existing pools; and irrigation and related products consisting of irrigation system components, and professional lawn care equipment and supplies. It also provides building materials, such as concrete, plumbing and electrical components, functional and decorative pool surfaces, decking materials, tiles, hardscapes, and natural stones for pool installations and remodeling; and commercial products, including heaters, safety equipment, and commercial pumps and filters. In addition, the company offers other pool construction and recreational products comprising discretionary recreational and related outdoor living products, such as grills and components for outdoor kitchens. It serves swimming pool remodelers and builders; specialty retailers that sell swimming pool supplies; swimming pool repair and service businesses; irrigation construction and landscape maintenance contractors; and commercial customers that serve hotels, universities, and community recreational facilities. As of March 03, 2022, the company operated 410 sales centers in North America, Europe, and Australia. Pool Corporation was incorporated in 1993 and is headquartered in Covington, Louisiana.
SectorIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - Distribution
CEOPeter D. Arvan
HeadquartersCovington,LA,US
Official Websitehttps://www.poolcorp.com
Employees (FY)6,00K
Average Revenue (1Y)$881,56K
Net Income per Employee$67,73K

Learn More about Pool Corp (POOL)

Pool Corp (POOL) FAQ

What's the stock price of Pool Corp (POOL) today?

x
Pool Corp (POOL) is currently trading at $214,94, with a 24h change of +%0,43. The 52-week trading range is $195,50–$216,16.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Pool Corp (POOL)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Pool Corp (POOL)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Pool Corp (POOL)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Pool Corp (POOL)?

x

Should you buy or sell Pool Corp (POOL) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Pool Corp (POOL)?

x

How to buy Pool Corp (POOL) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Pool Corp (POOL) Latest News

2026-04-10 13:46

Trident Digital Tech 与 Ripple Strategy Holding 合作,推进加纳稳定币支付试点

Gate News message, April 10, Nasdaq-listed company Trident Digital Tech Holdings has reached a strategic cooperation agreement with Ripple Strategy Holding. Under the agreement, Ripple Strategy Holding will provide Trident with RLUSD stablecoin technology and payment infrastructure, supporting its expansion of business in the African market. Trident plans to build a blockchain tax settlement and reporting system in Ghana for approximately 2.1 million small and micro businesses, and to set up an RLUSD/GHS (Ghanaian cedi) liquidity pool to build a low-cost, real-time settlement foreign exchange market that supports cross-border payments around the clock. The stablecoin business pilot is expected to begin in mid-2026.

2026-04-09 03:00

Jupiter opens 2026 Q1 ASR reward claim, total prize pool 50 million JUP

Gate News message, April 9, Jupiter officially announced that ASR rewards for the first quarter of 2026 are now open for application, with a total prize pool of 50 million JUP.

2026-04-08 09:59

WLFI borrows $50.44 million in stablecoins; the treasury runs out, causing DeFi liquidity to turn negative

Gate News message: World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has, on its lending platform Dolomite, borrowed more than 50 million US dollars worth of $1 stablecoins in just five days, drawing widespread attention across the DeFi market. On-chain data shows that WLFI’s treasury moved in about 3 billion WLFI governance tokens as collateral, borrowed $50.44 million in stablecoins, causing Dolomite’s fund pool utilization rate to exceed 100%, with only 232k tokens of remaining liquidity and the supply of $1 stablecoins nearly exhausted. This move pushed deposit interest rates in the lending market up to 35.81%, with borrowing costs reaching 30%, indicating that the behavior of a single internal entity directly created on-chain scarcity. Since January 2026, WLFI, through a partnership with Dolomite, has launched World Liberty Markets. Its USD1 dollar-pegged stablecoin is supported by US Treasuries and cash equivalents, with a market cap of about $3.5 billion. Analysts believe this operation may be driven by internal liquidity needs or by artificially boosting on-chain activity and total value locked (TVL). Currently, WLFI collateral makes up more than half of Dolomite’s TVL in that market. Analysts warn that high-yield lenders may not be able to withdraw funds in a timely manner until the large borrowing positions are liquidated; otherwise, liquidation risk could spill over and affect the entire liquidity pool. The community has compared this situation to a pattern seen in past DeFi cycles, where chasing high yields led to liquidity crises. Even though the high interest rates are real, they reflect artificially created market scarcity rather than natural supply and demand. Investors and lending participants should closely monitor Dolomite’s real-time liquidity pool data and carefully assess risks to prevent chain-reaction liquidations triggered by WLFI token price volatility.

2026-04-08 07:02

Jiang Zhuoer shorted ETH at 2,242 dollars, saying the bear market cycle has not finished yet

Gate News message, April 8, Leibit Mining Pool BTC.TOP founder and CEO Jiang Zhuo’er posted that he shorted ETH at $2,242. This is a medium- to short-term trade, just like the last time he went long at $1,850 and closed the position at $2,144. Jiang Zhuo’er said the bear market cycle hasn’t finished yet; any event-driven rebounds are opportunities to add shorts, and there’s also a small chance of starting the battle again.

Hot Posts About Pool Corp (POOL)

AirdropHunterWang

AirdropHunterWang

21 minutes ago
Do you remember the Terraform collapse in 2022 that shook the entire crypto market? Recently, another major detail has come to light—high-frequency trading firm Jane Street is accused of insider trading, and this time, the trading may have directly accelerated Terra's demise. Todd Snyder, the bankruptcy trustee of Terraform Labs, recently filed a lawsuit against Jane Street, accusing this trading giant of using insider information to front-run trades. What exactly happened? On May 7th, Terraform quietly withdrew 150 million UST from Curve3pool. The question is—Jane Street-related wallets also withdrew 85 million UST from the same pool within 10 minutes. The timing was too coincidental, almost immediately triggering market panic. Why is this considered insider trading? Because Snyder believes Jane Street had access to non-public market information, using that advantage to act before the public and profit from it. This move directly caused UST to lose its 1:1 peg to the dollar, and Luna subsequently collapsed to zero. The entire process took less than a week, with a $40 billion market cap evaporating. Even more interesting, on May 9th, UST started to decline. Jane Street employee Bryce Pratt sent a message to the Do Kwon team saying he wanted to buy Bitcoin or Luna. Kwon’s response implied that Jump’s co-founder should have notified them earlier about the funding. Snyder submitted these details as evidence of insider trading. Of course, Jane Street denies the allegations. They say it’s a "desperate" and "baseless" lawsuit meant to extort money from them. They also emphasize that the losses suffered by Terra and Luna holders were due to fraud by Terraform’s management, not their trading activities. This case actually reflects a bigger issue: even in transparent DeFi systems, information asymmetry still exists. As a market participant, is Jane Street trading normally or truly exploiting insider advantages? This will be a difficult legal question to define. But from a market perspective, if these allegations are true, it indeed shows that even on the blockchain, big players can find ways to gain informational advantages.
0
0
0
0
PuppiesSunYue

PuppiesSunYue

28 minutes ago
If the 2025 "GENIUS Act" is considered the "Constitutional Moment" for U.S. stablecoins, then the new draft regulation released by the FDIC in April 2026 marks the official beginning of the "Enforcement Era." This week, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) published a proposed rule in the Federal Register, opening a comment period of nearly two months, ending on June 9. It provides clear constraints and guidelines regarding the issuance of stablecoins by banks and fintech subsidiaries. In simple terms, the FDIC is turning the 2025 enacted "Guidelines and Establishment of a U.S. Stablecoin Innovation Act" (GENIUS Act) into more concrete and enforceable operational checklists and regulatory rules. Why does the FDIC have the authority to speak? The legitimacy of regulatory power. To understand the significance of this draft, one must first understand the background of the FDIC. The FDIC, officially the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, is an independent federal agency established by Congress. Its core responsibilities include insuring bank deposits, examining and supervising the safety and soundness of financial institutions, and handling bank failures. The FDIC directly supervises a large category of state-chartered banks and savings institutions that are not members of the Federal Reserve System, giving it the authority to set rules on their safety, capital, liquidity, customer protection, and deposit insurance coverage. In domestic terms, this is similar to the functions of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC). Therefore, the FDIC inherently has regulatory authority to issue draft guidelines on stablecoins. If a bank or its subsidiary issues new liabilities related to the U.S. dollar payment system, the FDIC would naturally be concerned with risks related to capital, liquidity, redemption, custody, disclosure, and misleading sales. The draft guidelines released this time mainly target stablecoin issuers within the FDIC-regulated banking system, especially "Qualified Payment Stablecoin Issuers" (PPSI) established by FDIC-regulated depository institutions through subsidiaries, and also cover some custody and safekeeping activities. More importantly, this is directly authorized by the "GENIUS Act." The law was signed by Trump on July 18, 2025, explicitly requiring the FDIC, OCC, Federal Reserve, NCUA, and the Treasury Department to develop implementation rules for stablecoin issuers within their respective jurisdictions. For the FDIC, it is the primary regulator of stablecoin subsidiaries operated by state non-member banks and state savings institutions under its supervision. This also explains its relationship with existing stablecoin legislation: this draft is not new legislation but one of the implementation rules of the GENIUS Act. The GENIUS Act is already the first comprehensive federal legal framework for stablecoins in the U.S., requiring only "licensed payment stablecoin issuers" to legally issue such stablecoins in the U.S., with bank subsidiaries regulated by their main banking supervisor, and federally licensed non-bank issuers primarily overseen by the OCC. In December 2025, the FDIC had already issued a preliminary draft on "how bank subsidiaries can apply for approval to issue stablecoins." The April 2026 draft further adds substantive requirements for reserves, redemption, capital, liquidity, risk management, custody, and disclosure after approval. It sends a clear signal to the banking industry: do not try to exploit the line between deposit insurance and tokenized deposits. Six key points of the new regulation: from "1:1 reserves" to "prohibition of interest payments." Looking specifically at this FDIC draft, the most important parts define six rules for the stablecoin game within the banking system. First is reserve assets. The draft requires issuers to always maintain at least a 1:1 ratio of identifiable reserves to cover all circulating stablecoins, and the value of these reserves must never fall below the total face value of unredeemed stablecoins at any point. Issuers must also keep records linking specific reserves to particular stablecoin brands. The FDIC also proposes that if a subsidiary issues multiple different stablecoin brands, each brand should have a segregated, traceable, and separately recorded reserve pool, avoiding mixing to reduce the risk of contagion if one fails. Second is the quality, liquidity, and realizability of reserves. The draft not only requires issuers to hold at least a 1:1 ratio of identifiable reserves but also emphasizes that these reserves must have strong liquidity to be quickly converted into usable funds during redemption pressure. Regarding the use of reserve assets, the FDIC plans to explicitly restrict arrangements such as rehypothecation or reuse of reserves. For repurchase agreements based on short-term U.S. Treasury securities, the draft proposes a conditional framework. For reverse repos, it is still seeking opinions on how to define excess collateral and whether more specific restrictions are needed, with no fully clear limits yet. Third is the "T+2" redemption deadline. The FDIC requires issuers to publicly disclose redemption policies, including timing, procedures, and minimum redemption amounts. "Timely redemption" is defined as completing within two business days after a redemption request. Any discretionary restrictions on timely redemption should generally be approved by the FDIC, not decided solely by the issuer. The minimum redemption amount cannot exceed one stablecoin, ensuring retail investors' rights. Fourth is a "positive and negative activity list." The FDIC limits the "core activities" of payment stablecoin issuers to issuance, redemption, reserve management, and limited custody services. Other activities can only directly support these core functions, with "direct support" subject to regulatory interpretation. The draft also explicitly states several restrictions: - Cannot imply that stablecoins are backed by U.S. government credit. - Cannot imply federal deposit insurance coverage. - Cannot pay interest or yields solely because users hold or use stablecoins. - Issuers are prohibited from lending to customers to buy their own stablecoins, as this would introduce leverage into the "1:1 reserve" backing. Fifth is the management of capital, liquidity, and risk resilience. The FDIC does not simply adopt standard banking capital ratios but proposes a more flexible framework. PPSI must hold at least CET1 and AT1 capital instruments as regulatory capital and establish self-assessment and compliance processes. For more complex or higher-risk activities, the FDIC can require additional capital or reserve buffers. The FDIC believes that if an issuer only conducts narrow issuance and redemption activities, capital requirements may be lower. But engaging in more activities increases the importance of capital adequacy. Sixth is the weekly and monthly disclosure system. The draft requires issuers to disclose reserve composition monthly on their websites, along with redemption policies and related fees. Issuers must also submit confidential weekly reports to the FDIC. More importantly, the monthly reserve disclosures are not solely by the issuer; the draft requires an independent CPA to review and issue a written report on the monthly data. Additionally, the CEO and CFO must certify the accuracy of the monthly reports to the FDIC. By linking public disclosure, third-party review, and executive accountability, the draft significantly raises the bar for ongoing compliance and information authenticity. A more sensitive point is that the FDIC clarifies that deposits held at banks as stablecoin reserves should not be claimed as FDIC insurance through "piercing the corporate veil." It also clarifies that if a "tokenized deposit" essentially qualifies as a deposit, it will not be treated differently just because it is on-chain or tokenized under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. In other words, stablecoins are not deposit insurance products, but genuine "tokenized deposits" may still be considered deposits and be insured. How will the "new regulation" influence the market? Currently, this draft is only a proposed rule, not a final regulation, and it applies only to FDIC-regulated banks/subsidiaries and related custody activities. The FDIC estimates that in the initial years, only about 5 to 30 FDIC-regulated institutions might apply for and obtain approval to issue stablecoins through subsidiaries, with dozens more providing custody services. However, the regulatory impact is significant. First, it is the real implementation of the GENIUS Act, transforming abstract legislation into enforceable regulation. Together with the OCC's parallel rules issued in February and the Treasury's AML/sanctions rules in April, it is shaping a comprehensive federal stablecoin regulatory framework. Finally, it will significantly influence future market competition: institutions with stronger compliance capabilities, capital, and banking infrastructure will have advantages over "light-asset, marketing, and yield-driven" crypto-native models. Especially, the restrictions on paying interest to holders, limits on reserve reuse, and strict statements on FDIC insurance could favor traditional banks and highly compliant issuers. Therefore, this draft should not be seen as a broad positive for crypto but as a crucial step in refining U.S. stablecoin regulation into concrete regulatory text. Legislatively, it is subordinate to the GENIUS Act, but practically, it is far more important than political slogans. Traditional banking giants with licenses, strong capital, and the capacity to endure strict audits and low margins will soon have their own compliant stablecoin playground. The U.S. stablecoin landscape is about to usher in a new wave.
0
0
0
0