The Fed may be forced to include Bitcoin in bank stress tests

TapChiBitcoin
BTC-1,53%

Former Bitcoin strategy director Pierre Rochard calls on the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) to include Bitcoin in bank stress test scenarios at the right time, as the Fed is currently soliciting public input for the 2026 scenario framework and proposing increased transparency in model development. The question is not whether the Fed “supports” Bitcoin, but whether this agency can consider Bitcoin as a risk variable without turning it into policy.

According to analysis, the issue lies in the technical aspects and the degree of Bitcoin’s integration with the banking system. The Fed will not include Bitcoin in stress tests solely based on a call, but if the exposure of banks to Bitcoin through custody, derivatives, ETF intermediaries, or brokerage services is significant enough to impact capital and liquidity, the Fed may be compelled to model Bitcoin price shocks similarly to stocks or credit spreads.

This does not imply recognition or endorsement of Bitcoin but reflects the reality that this asset has become too intertwined with the balance sheets of regulated financial institutions to ignore. In the current framework, Bitcoin may first appear as a shock in the “global market shock” scenario designed for banks with large trading and custody activities, rather than becoming a core macroeconomic variable.

If included in stress tests, Bitcoin will be standardized as a risk factor requiring management, leading to stricter limits, governance, modeling, and compliance requirements for related business areas. In other words, Bitcoin will only enter the Fed’s stress testing when regulators have no choice but to account for it.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Crypto Market Declines for Three Consecutive Days, BTC Narrows Losses and Rebounds Above $70,000, GameFi Sector Rises Against the Trend

The crypto market has declined for three consecutive days, with the SocialFi sector down 4.65%, while Bitcoin and Ethereum fell 0.88% and 1.94% respectively. GameFi showed strength, with Axie Infinity up 3.84%. Other sectors generally declined, with some tokens such as eCash and PIPPIN posting modest gains. Overall sector indices show varying degrees of decline.

GateNews7m ago

Analysts Recommend Holding "Dry Powder" During Price Volatility, BTC Oscillates Near $70,000

Gate News reported that on March 20, a certain analyst advised investors to hold "dry powder" (referring to cash reserves or funds awaiting investment) during periods of price volatility. On Thursday, Bitcoin price fluctuated around $70,377.59 and moved in the direction of $69,000.

GateNews11m ago

A certain crypto whale liquidates a long BTC position in a perpetual loan, incurring a loss of 14.02 million USD

On March 20, on-chain data showed that a whale suffered a loss of $14.02 million from going long on BTC and liquidated 742.8 WBTC at a cost of approximately $89,137, now selling at $70,266 to repay Aave borrowings.

GateNews12m ago

Morgan Stanley Moves to Launch First Major Bank Bitcoin ETF, Poised to Rival BlackRock's IBIT

Morgan Stanley has filed an amended S-1 registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT), a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) set to trade on NYSE Arca under the ticker MSBT.

CryptopulseElite33m ago
Comment
0/400
No comments