Author: Jake Nyquist, Founder of Hook Protocol
Translation: Blockchain Knight
By 2026, major institutions will launch entirely new prediction markets.
From the past five years of competition between NFT and perpetual contract exchanges, we have already understood: differentiated products can quickly capture market share.
Although leading platforms currently hold advantages in liquidity and regulation, they carry heavy product and technical debt, making it difficult to respond flexibly to new entrants.
So how should new players compete? In my view, the differentiation in prediction markets revolves around seven key dimensions:
1. Product Quality
Founding teams can create differentiation through front-end user experience, API stability, development documentation, market structure, fee mechanisms, and more.
Most established platforms currently have obvious shortcomings: unreasonable tier settings, opaque fee rules, slow and unstable APIs, and single order types.
A high-quality user experience, especially services tailored for API algorithmic traders, is a lasting core advantage that can help even against channel-strong competitors to establish a foothold.
2. Asset Types and Market Selection
Currently, trading volume in prediction markets is mainly concentrated in sports betting and native crypto markets.
New exchanges can launch exclusive markets unavailable on other platforms. When combined with vertical strategy (point 7), this advantage can be further amplified.
3. Capital Efficiency
Capital efficiency determines how effectively traders can utilize collateral. There are two main approaches:
First, interest-earning collateral: not letting idle funds earn only government bond yields, but providing higher returns—similar to Lighter supporting LP deposits as collateral, and HyENA’s USDE margin perpetual contracts.
Second, margin mechanisms. Due to gap risk, the leverage value of prediction markets is generally underestimated. However, platforms can offer limited leverage for continuous markets or implement portfolio margining for hedging positions.
Exchanges can also subsidize lending pools or act as market-making counterparts to internalize gap risks, rather than passing losses onto users.
4. Oracles and Market Settlement
The reliability of oracles remains a systemic weakness in the industry. Settlement delays and incorrect results can significantly amplify trading risks.
Beyond improving stability, platforms can implement innovative oracle mechanisms: hybrid human-machine systems, zero-knowledge proof-based solutions, AI-driven context-aware oracles, unlocking new markets that traditional oracles cannot support.
5. Liquidity Provision
The survival of an exchange depends on liquidity. Viable paths include: paying for professional market makers, incentivizing regular users with tokens to provide liquidity, and adopting Hyperliquid’s HLP aggregated liquidity model.
Some platforms may also fully internalize liquidity, emulating FTX’s model of relying on Alameda as an internal trading team.
6. Regulatory Compliance
Kalshi, with its US regulatory approval, has achieved embedded distribution with Robinhood and Coinbase, capturing retail traffic that Polymarket cannot reach.
There are still many jurisdictions and regulatory frameworks to explore. Compliant prediction markets can unlock similar channels, such as adapting to US state gambling regulations.
7. Vertical vs. Horizontal Strategies
Horizontal Strategy: Similar to Hyperliquid in perpetual contracts, focusing on building top-tier underlying trading infrastructure, inviting third parties to develop front-ends and vertical scenarios, and encouraging ecosystem builders to add markets and develop revenue-generating front-ends (like Phantom).
Vertical Strategy: Represented by Lighter, which autonomously controls the front-end, launches mobile apps, and creates a seamless user experience, emphasizing integrated experience and direct user connection.
Polymarket’s resistance to deep embedded cooperation versus Kalshi’s open approach exemplifies the trade-offs between these two strategies.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Vitalik: Prediction markets help us understand the world and the near future
BlockBeats News, on March 6, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin stated that prediction markets help us better understand the world and the near future. I hope prediction market projects can further optimize in this direction, especially with more conditional markets.
BlockBeats has launched a prediction market section where users can subscribe to exclusive updates.
GateNews2h ago
Bitcoin Price Predictions Flip Bullish, But Ethereum Is Still Stuck
Predictors have turned bullish on Bitcoin's near-term price, suggesting a rise to $84,000 before a potential drop. However, analysts remain divided on sustainability, while sentiment for Ethereum is bearish, with expectations of a decline to $1,500.
Decrypt10h ago
Polymarket pre-market prediction: WBC Australia will win. Taiwanese baseball fans learned a lesson in prediction markets.
The Chinese Taipei team lost 0:3 to Australia in their first game of the 2026 World Baseball Classic, disappointing fans. The prediction market Polymarket shows Australia's win probability at 64%. However, traditional Taiwanese betting odds suggest that the Chinese Taipei team has a 70% chance of winning, indicating the influence of supporter bias. Analysis points out that Polymarket's predictions are more accurate, reflecting the benefits of diverse participants and data analysis, and highlighting the future potential of prediction markets.
動區BlockTempo15h ago
Bloomberg: Prediction market track rapidly emerging, Polymarket, Kalshi, and Opinion form a three-way competition
PANews March 5 News, according to Bloomberg, prediction markets have experienced rapid growth over the past year, attracting widespread attention including from traditional financial institutions. The main platforms in the industry currently include Polymarket, Kalshi, and Opinion, which are seen as the primary competitors in the market landscape.
The report points out that as the regulatory environment gradually becomes clearer and trading demand around macro events and hot topics continues to grow, prediction markets are becoming an important new frontier at the intersection of the crypto industry and traditional finance.
GateNews16h ago
Senator Chris Murphy questions insider trading related to Iran airstrike predictions in the prediction market, with million-dollar bets sparking controversy over "White House corruption"
U.S. Senator Chris Murphy expressed concern over prediction market trading ahead of military actions against Iran, accusing large bets of potentially involving insider information and leading to corruption that profits from war. He mentioned that certain accounts placed precise bets before the airstrikes and reaped huge profits, calling for legislation to restrict such transactions to protect national security. This has sparked widespread discussion in U.S. politics about war powers and transparency.
GateNews20h ago
Polymarket nuclear explosion contract attracts $650,000 in trading! Sparks ethical and insider controversy, official removal in emergency.
Polymarket has sparked public controversy for listing nuclear explosion prediction contracts, being accused of exploiting human survival crises for speculation. The platform removed the contracts on March 4 and is facing regulatory pressure. Analysts point out that the platform may become a channel for insider trading, threatening the reputation of prediction markets. U.S. regulatory agencies plan to further regulate prediction markets, emphasizing the need to strike a balance between ethics and legality.
CryptoCity21h ago
