Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Ray Dalio just dropped a hot take that aged poorly in real time. The Bridgewater guy went on the All-In Podcast this week saying bitcoin shouldn't be compared to gold—claims it lacks central bank backing, has zero privacy, and faces quantum computing threats. His quote: 'There is only one gold.' Sounds pretty definitive, right?
Except the market had other ideas that same day. Gold tanked 3% while bitcoin barely flinched, down less than 1%. And this was during exactly the kind of crisis Dalio says gold is supposed to protect against—the U.S.-Iran escalation. So much for his thesis playing out in real time.
Here's the thing: neither asset actually performed like a proper safe haven this week. Both got volatile. Bitcoin just happened to be less volatile, which completely contradicts Dalio's framework about why gold is superior. Gold spiked on initial strikes, then gave back gains as the conflict expanded. Bitcoin sold off, bounced, got rejected at $70K, and has been choppy since.
Dalio's criticisms aren't new either. He's long flagged bitcoin's transparency issue—every transaction can be monitored and potentially controlled. He questions whether central banks would ever accumulate something running on a public ledger. And there's the quantum computing risk looming long-term.
But here's what's interesting: Dalio isn't actually bearish. He holds about 1% of his portfolio in bitcoin for diversification and previously recommended a 15% combined allocation to bitcoin or gold, calling it the best risk-adjusted play given America's debt spiral. Last month he warned that the U.S.-led world order had broken down and investors need to rethink wealth protection entirely.
The real debate happening right now is whether gold is still the only answer when the worst banks and financial systems face structural challenges. This week's price action shows the market actively questioning that assumption. Bitcoin held around $73.95K as risk appetite returned globally, with Asian markets and the S&P 500 recovering from the late-February conflict dip. U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs have been absorbing serious capital—over $56 billion in total inflows now—suggesting long-term holders are building positions regardless of Dalio's concerns.
The irony? Dalio's own logic about needing to rethink wealth protection might actually be bitcoin's strongest argument right now.