When it comes to blockchain, what is the first thing everyone thinks of? Absolute transparency. But in the financial world, this is often a double-edged sword.



Can you imagine—every bond transaction you make, every equity holding you have, being publicly available on the entire network in real time? In such a scenario, market manipulation and front-end trading could become rampant. That’s why many traditional financial institutions are still hesitant about whether to put their data on the chain.

Some projects are starting to think about this issue from a different perspective. The core idea is: complete transparency for regulators, while protecting privacy for ordinary users. It may sound contradictory, but it is technically feasible—using advanced privacy technologies to verify and execute transactions in encrypted form. Regulators hold the keys to access the full data, while ordinary participants cannot peek into others’ business activities.

This is not about shielding illegal activities, but about protecting legitimate trade secrets and trading strategies. This is precisely the prerequisite for large institutions to participate.

This approach can also be seen at the strategic level. For example, in deep cooperation with the EU DLT pilot regulatory framework, issuing a regulated Euro stablecoin EURQ—these are innovations within the rules. The goal is clear: to become a trusted extension of the traditional financial system, not an adversary.

Once this mechanism is operational, scenarios like bulk commodity trade financing and cross-border corporate fund management, which previously couldn’t be on-chain due to privacy concerns, will finally have technical solutions. This could be the key turning point for blockchain to integrate into mainstream finance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BanklessAtHeartvip
· 01-24 21:48
Nice, finally someone said it. The balance between transparency and privacy is the right way, not a dead end of either/or. This is actually the true meaning of compliance. Regulators are happy, big players are reassured, this move is indeed clever. Transparency for regulators and confidentiality for users? Sounds contradictory, but think about it, it's quite smart. Just worried that the implementation might turn into chaos. Things like EURQ are just testing the waters. The EU's stance is clear, we need to keep up. The real turning point depends on whether traditional giants will really get on board. Just talking nicely won't cut it. If privacy tech is well-developed, it can indeed open up many markets. The commodities sector has always been a pain point, is there now a solution? The question is, who holds the keys? Regulation is also power, this needs to be thought through carefully. It feels a bit ironic that blockchain has shifted from being an opponent to a tool. But that's just how reality is, better to get involved early. It's basically the logic of traditional finance starting to accept Web3, a compromise solution. But it's still better than fighting each other.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapienvip
· 01-24 07:23
This is what I want to hear. Achieving both transparency and privacy is the true breakthrough.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 01-22 08:53
Someone finally said it: transparency is not sustainable.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)