The discussion around quantum computers and their impact on cryptocurrencies is gaining momentum within the developer and investor communities. According to Adam Beck, co-founder of Blockstream, the current stage of adopting quantum technologies is still too early to pose a real threat to bitcoin. He states that over the next ten years, cryptocurrencies will remain protected from quantum attacks.
However, this optimistic forecast is not shared by all market participants. Nick Carter, partner at Castle Island Ventures, expresses concern about the consequences of such risk minimization. In his view, when influential voices in the crypto community deny the seriousness of the quantum threat, it creates a false sense of stability, which negatively affects investor confidence.
Carter’s position indicates an interesting market dynamic: pessimistic scenarios regarding quantum computers, even if unlikely in the near term, influence the current bitcoin price and the willingness of capital to enter the market. Divergences in risk assessment during the early stages of technology adoption reflect a broader industry communication issue — how experts should balance between informing the public and preventing panic.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Quantum risks for Bitcoin: experts disagree on the threat assessment during the early stages of adopting new technologies
The discussion around quantum computers and their impact on cryptocurrencies is gaining momentum within the developer and investor communities. According to Adam Beck, co-founder of Blockstream, the current stage of adopting quantum technologies is still too early to pose a real threat to bitcoin. He states that over the next ten years, cryptocurrencies will remain protected from quantum attacks.
However, this optimistic forecast is not shared by all market participants. Nick Carter, partner at Castle Island Ventures, expresses concern about the consequences of such risk minimization. In his view, when influential voices in the crypto community deny the seriousness of the quantum threat, it creates a false sense of stability, which negatively affects investor confidence.
Carter’s position indicates an interesting market dynamic: pessimistic scenarios regarding quantum computers, even if unlikely in the near term, influence the current bitcoin price and the willingness of capital to enter the market. Divergences in risk assessment during the early stages of technology adoption reflect a broader industry communication issue — how experts should balance between informing the public and preventing panic.