2026-01-12 11:30:01

The competitive landscape of the public chain ecosystem is far more complex than imagined. A closer look reveals that Solana hosts many high-quality launch platforms, forming a differentiated competitive pattern. In contrast, BSC has fallen into a situation of single-platform monopoly. Is this level of concentration truly beneficial for ecosystem development? Looking at it from a different perspective—if more leading launch platforms can be supported to coexist, allowing healthy competition among platforms, wouldn't that promote the diversification and prosperity of the entire ecosystem? Project teams would have more options, user experience could also be improved, and ecosystem vitality would naturally rise. A blooming scene of diverse flowers is the sustainable development path.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

retroactive_airdrop

· 01-12 23:33

The launch platform of the SOL ecosystem is indeed competitive, but BSC isn't that hopeless either. The key still depends on who can optimize the user experience to the extreme.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationTherapist

· 01-12 17:02

The SOL launch platform is indeed highly competitive, and BSC is feeling a bit suffocated. By the way, is monopoly really that bad? Competition also costs money. Coexistence of multiple platforms sounds great, but who will foot the bill? For BSC to turn things around, it still depends on whether someone dares to invest money to support new players. It seems that ultimately, ecological prosperity still relies on fundraising and marketing, not the idealistic approach. SOL's success isn't really mysterious; it's just willing to spend money to cultivate developers.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCoinSavant

· 01-12 12:00

ngl solana's launch pad diversity thesis is actually pretty based from a game theory perspective... but bsc monopoly cope is real though. the concentration coefficient here screams inefficiency fr fr

Reply0

BuyTheTop

· 01-12 12:00

The multi-platform competition of Solana is indeed more intense than BSC, but BSC's monopoly isn't necessarily a bad thing... It all depends on the project's bargaining power. Someone really should challenge PancakeSwap on BSC; monopolies lead to passive wins over time, and transaction fees are getting increasingly outrageous. Competition has its pros and cons. Too many platforms can lead to liquidity dispersion and make user choices more difficult. Although Solana has many platforms, its ecosystem's prosperity isn't necessarily much better than BSC's; it depends on actual user retention. Diversification is ideal, but in reality, only a few top platforms survive, while smaller platforms can't sustain themselves. BSC's monopoly is indeed a problem, but breaking the monopoly requires truly competitive platforms; it's not just about filling numbers. On Solana, platform competition is fierce, but the ultimate beneficiaries are those with capital support; small and medium platforms are still being crushed. A hundred flowers blooming sounds nice, but in the market, the law of the jungle of the strong and the weak has never changed.

View OriginalReply0

LidoStakeAddict

· 01-12 11:59

Sol ecosystem is just a BSC copy, that's a fact. The monopoly situation on BSC is truly speechless; it should have been broken long ago. Multi-platform competition can produce good stuff; monopoly will only lead to complacency. I am optimistic about Sol's development direction; project teams choosing multiple options is more comfortable. Ecological vitality still depends on competition; monopoly is just poison. The dominance of PancakeSwap needs to be changed. Competition is always a good medicine; just look at how Sol plays. BSC lacks this kind of healthy competitive atmosphere. Multi-platform coexistence is the right way; otherwise, the ecosystem will eventually fail.

View OriginalReply0

SelfStaking

· 01-12 11:55

Solana ecosystem is indeed very competitive, but the monopolistic situation on BSC really needs to change.

View OriginalReply0

NFTFreezer

· 01-12 11:55

Sol ecosystem is indeed much more wild; BSC has long been dominated by giants. The days of platform monopoly should be over; competition is the only way to produce good stuff. It would be great if BSC could really produce a few new forces; right now, it all feels like just a backdrop. But speaking of which, why can SOL gather so many platforms? There must be some threshold differences. Diversification sounds great, but the key is still traffic; without users, competition is pointless. Ecosystem vitality, to put it plainly, depends on who can suck blood more fiercely.

View OriginalReply0

0xInsomnia

· 01-12 11:32

The Sol ecosystem is really competitive this time, while BSC feels like it's been monopolized by one entity, it's so suffocating.

View OriginalReply0