After working on several tech projects valued at over ten billion USD, I discovered a common phenomenon: most projects have very small technical teams and lack a complete set of core skills.
So why are they able to secure such high funding and valuations? Ultimately, investors believe not in the product itself, nor in the team's execution ability, but in the personal charisma and endorsement of the 1-2 founders. In other words, valuation depends more on how eloquent the founders are rather than the true hard skills of the team.
This phenomenon is especially evident in Web3 and blockchain startups. Many projects have a good reputation, but upon closer inspection, their technical foundation and team composition are far less solid than imagined.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
After working on several tech projects valued at over ten billion USD, I discovered a common phenomenon: most projects have very small technical teams and lack a complete set of core skills.
So why are they able to secure such high funding and valuations? Ultimately, investors believe not in the product itself, nor in the team's execution ability, but in the personal charisma and endorsement of the 1-2 founders. In other words, valuation depends more on how eloquent the founders are rather than the true hard skills of the team.
This phenomenon is especially evident in Web3 and blockchain startups. Many projects have a good reputation, but upon closer inspection, their technical foundation and team composition are far less solid than imagined.