When a project controls 99.999999% of token supply, it's basically a green light for potential rug mechanics. Supply concentration at that level? That's not tokenomics—that's a pre-written exit strategy wrapped in whitepaper language.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BankruptWorker
· 13h ago
99.999999% this number looks outrageous, it feels like writing a novel.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 13h ago
99.999999% of the supply is concentrated... Isn't this a ticking time bomb? No matter how nicely the white paper is packaged, it can't hide it.
View OriginalReply0
DaoDeveloper
· 13h ago
ngl this is just standard rug setup with extra steps. the concentration ratio tells you everything—once you parse through the governance theater, it's just centralized control cosplaying as defi. seen this pattern in like 20+ projects already, merkle tree proofs don't fix a fundamentally broken incentive structure.
Reply0
NFTFreezer
· 13h ago
99.999999% of the supply is concentrated... I just want to ask, do we still need to read the white paper? It's basically a landmine.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHopper
· 14h ago
99.9999999%... Oh my, this number is ridiculously off the charts, clearly a ticking time bomb.
When a project controls 99.999999% of token supply, it's basically a green light for potential rug mechanics. Supply concentration at that level? That's not tokenomics—that's a pre-written exit strategy wrapped in whitepaper language.