OM1 platform supports both ROS2 and Zenoh middleware, but they serve different use cases.



ROS2 brings production-grade maturity and rich feature sets—perfect if you're working with legacy systems, running advanced navigation stacks, or dealing with complex SLAM algorithms. The tradeoff: heavier computational overhead and bandwidth consumption.

Zenoh takes the opposite approach. It's built for speed and efficiency, stripping away unnecessary layers to deliver a lightweight, high-performance middleware stack. Think minimal latency, lower network footprint, and simpler deployment.

So which one? ROS2 if you need battle-tested reliability and sophisticated capabilities. Zenoh if you're optimizing for efficiency and real-time responsiveness. Many teams actually run both—it just depends on your architecture demands.
STX-0,21%
THINK0,51%
ON4,31%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHerovip
· 11h ago
It has proven that the two protocol architectures are designed to serve different scenarios. The ROS2 architecture is mature and reliable, but it consumes resources. I would like to see actual test data comparing it with Zenoh, this low-latency solution.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHuggervip
· 11h ago
ROS2 production-grade reliability is indeed impressive, but I'm more interested in Zenoh's lightweight approach.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlertvip
· 11h ago
The shortcomings of ROS2 really consume too many resources, and I truly love Zenoh's lightweight design.
View OriginalReply0
DaoTherapyvip
· 11h ago
Neither can run away, let's see what your architecture is made of.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeatervip
· 11h ago
Good morning everyone, ROS2 is just a middleman relying on old assets, while Zenoh is the real arbitrage opportunity. Lightweight solutions reduce gas costs, whereas heavy-duty schemes are just tipping miners.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBrokevip
· 11h ago
ROS2 has been using so many resources for so long, while Zenoh is so lightweight—why isn't anyone using it?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)