One approach worth exploring: dial back rewards for casual stakers or introduce alternative staking tracks that sidestep slashing penalties altogether. This could help level the playing field between different participant types in the ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpStrategist
· 1h ago
Lower retail staking rewards? Ha, a classic case of killing the goose to get the eggs. The concentration of chips will be even higher, which is a benefit for big players.
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezer
· 01-12 10:59
Huh, isn't this just fueling the conflict? Casual stakers already can't afford to play, and now they have to get lower rewards...
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviser
· 01-12 10:52
This gameplay sounds good, but how many can actually execute it properly...
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 01-12 10:49
Forget it, it's not worth the hassle to keep going like this. The experience for casual stakers has always been poor, and now we have to manage two sets of tracks? Do you really think we all have spare money to set up validation nodes?
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborer
· 01-12 10:43
Forget it, this approach is just ridiculous. Having two systems actually makes it more fragmented.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 01-12 10:39
Hmm... this logic is a bit absurd. Lowering the rewards for casual stakers to "level the field"? That's backwards.
One approach worth exploring: dial back rewards for casual stakers or introduce alternative staking tracks that sidestep slashing penalties altogether. This could help level the playing field between different participant types in the ecosystem.