2026-01-12 10:10:41

#美国非农就业数据未达市场预期 SOL technical analysis once again draws attention, with the 138 level indeed becoming a key resistance zone on the daily chart. From on-chain data, significant capital continues to flow in, and institutional buying is gradually accumulating. The logic for going long on SOL at this level is actually simple—follow the trend, and wait for the surge when US stocks open in the evening.

$ETH has already seen many players accumulating at low levels earlier, and as the leading ecosystem token, SOL is naturally within the scope of consideration. The key is whether the support at 138 can hold, and how much help the subsequent US stock market trend can provide. The current approach is to protect stop-losses and wait for the evening’s rhythm.

The flow of on-chain funds often reflects the true intentions of institutions, and this accumulation signal is indeed worth paying attention to. Whether to jump in mainly depends on individual understanding of technical analysis and risk tolerance.

SOL2,03%

ETH1,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 20h ago

138 is really a tough barrier, institutions are accumulating, and retail investors are still hesitating. Waiting for the US stock market to open, this wave will either take off or plunge, gambling is not advisable. To be honest, on-chain data looks good, but who can guarantee it's not a trap to lure short sellers? Stop-loss must be tight, otherwise breaking 138 will hit hard directly.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-12 10:40

138 is really a tough barrier. Watching institutions quietly build positions makes me eager to jump in.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressHunter

· 01-12 10:38

If 138 can't hold, this wave will be awkward --- Institutions are gradually accumulating, and we also need to stay calm and not FOMO when the night trading pulls us. --- Sounds nice, but isn't it just gambling on the US stock market? The risk is not small. --- On-chain fund flows can indeed reveal some clues, but in the end, it still depends on your own judgment. --- I need to observe SOL at this position a bit more; setting a stop-loss is the key. --- The logic sounds clear, but can the 138 line really hold? It's a bit uncertain. --- Institutions are accumulating? Then I need to see how much ammo I still have in my wallet.

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 01-12 10:33

138 support level breaks, then just wait to be smashed. I was educated like this back in 2017. Before getting in, ask yourself: can you withstand a 50% cut? US stocks rallying overnight? Ha, I've heard too many stories like that. Institutional buying accumulation? That's probably them taking over our positions. Set your stop-loss and don't change it. This is the lesson I learned after losing dozens of ETH.

View OriginalReply0

Blockblind

· 01-12 10:25

If I can't hold on at 138, I'll run. Anyway, with the non-farm payrolls so volatile these days, no one can predict how the US stock market will move in tonight's session.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-12 10:24

138 does feel a bit stuck, but on-chain data is indeed piling up. That's quite interesting. --- If the US stock market wants to rally in the night session, SOL will probably follow, depending on whether the support can hold. --- Institutions are lurking? Then I need to reconsider how to set the stop-loss. --- The non-farm payroll data is so bad, yet you're still willing to go long. You guys are pretty bold. --- ETH is already lurking, and SOL is still hesitating. Whether to follow or not is the question. --- The key is how much expectation gap that night session can bring; otherwise, technical analysis is pointless. --- Should we hold the line at 138 or give up? It feels a bit hard to judge.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekMaster