Here's a thought: 99% of humanity's resources stay grounded on Earth. But what if we redirected that final 1%? Space exploration isn't just about rockets and telescope shots—it's about questioning how we allocate capital. Whether it's mining asteroids, establishing off-world infrastructure, or pure scientific discovery, that 1% could reshape our understanding of resource scarcity and economic models. Worth the gamble?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanLarryvip
· 7h ago
1% sounds small, but can it really make a difference? It still feels like just talk.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizardvip
· 14h ago
Basically, it's about making money from money. Space mining sounds a bit far-fetched. --- Can 1% really change the world? Come on, Earth’s mess hasn’t even been fully settled yet. --- Hmm... sounds very appealing, but who will foot the bill? --- Capital is always looking for new plunder grounds, and this time it’s outer space. --- Asteroid mining is really hot right now, but I’m just worried it’s another new way to harvest the naive.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaservip
· 14h ago
1% sounds like not much, but if you really invest heavily, who knows what could happen. I think we should first figure out the Earth's problems before talking about anything else.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fcvip
· 14h ago
Honestly, 1% sounds pitifully small, but given the Earth's abundant resources, the reality is that the wealth gap is so severe that that 1% is essentially never enough.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForAirdropsvip
· 14h ago
Is 1% enough? Instead of wasting money on Earth, it's better to go all in on space mining. We've should have been doing this all along.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmivip
· 14h ago
Listen, 1% sounds small, but can that amount really save the Earth? Let's understand what's in front of us before talking about space.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemistvip
· 14h ago
ngl the 1% allocation thesis hits different when you think about it through yield optimization mechanics... like what's the risk-adjusted return on asteroid mining protocols vs traditional capital deployment? the transmutation of terrestrial scarcity into off-world abundance is basically the philosopher's stone we've been chasing, fr
Reply0
GasWaster69vip
· 14h ago
Honestly, 1% sounds small, but actually investing that much is still an astronomical number. The key is that we haven't even tidied up this mess on Earth yet.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)