Here's a thought: 99% of humanity's resources stay grounded on Earth. But what if we redirected that final 1%? Space exploration isn't just about rockets and telescope shots—it's about questioning how we allocate capital. Whether it's mining asteroids, establishing off-world infrastructure, or pure scientific discovery, that 1% could reshape our understanding of resource scarcity and economic models. Worth the gamble?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanLarry
· 7h ago
1% sounds small, but can it really make a difference? It still feels like just talk.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizard
· 14h ago
Basically, it's about making money from money. Space mining sounds a bit far-fetched.
---
Can 1% really change the world? Come on, Earth’s mess hasn’t even been fully settled yet.
---
Hmm... sounds very appealing, but who will foot the bill?
---
Capital is always looking for new plunder grounds, and this time it’s outer space.
---
Asteroid mining is really hot right now, but I’m just worried it’s another new way to harvest the naive.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 14h ago
1% sounds like not much, but if you really invest heavily, who knows what could happen. I think we should first figure out the Earth's problems before talking about anything else.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 14h ago
Honestly, 1% sounds pitifully small, but given the Earth's abundant resources, the reality is that the wealth gap is so severe that that 1% is essentially never enough.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForAirdrops
· 14h ago
Is 1% enough? Instead of wasting money on Earth, it's better to go all in on space mining. We've should have been doing this all along.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmi
· 14h ago
Listen, 1% sounds small, but can that amount really save the Earth? Let's understand what's in front of us before talking about space.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemist
· 14h ago
ngl the 1% allocation thesis hits different when you think about it through yield optimization mechanics... like what's the risk-adjusted return on asteroid mining protocols vs traditional capital deployment? the transmutation of terrestrial scarcity into off-world abundance is basically the philosopher's stone we've been chasing, fr
Reply0
GasWaster69
· 14h ago
Honestly, 1% sounds small, but actually investing that much is still an astronomical number. The key is that we haven't even tidied up this mess on Earth yet.
Here's a thought: 99% of humanity's resources stay grounded on Earth. But what if we redirected that final 1%? Space exploration isn't just about rockets and telescope shots—it's about questioning how we allocate capital. Whether it's mining asteroids, establishing off-world infrastructure, or pure scientific discovery, that 1% could reshape our understanding of resource scarcity and economic models. Worth the gamble?