In 2026, just at the start, the global financial markets have entered a new period of uncertainty. Interest rate policy adjustments, changes in central bank decisions, repeated policy expectations... These macro factors directly impact each investor's asset allocation. Whenever this happens, smart investors are doing the same thing: seeking deterministic returns.
Traditional financial markets are experiencing increased volatility, but in this environment, a certain type of strategy is gaining attention—earning interest on stablecoins to hedge against uncertainty. Instead of passively bearing risks during market turbulence, it’s better to allocate part of your funds to more stable yield strategies.
A recently discussed approach is: using mainstream assets (such as BNB, ETH) as collateral to mint interest-bearing stablecoins on-chain, which can preserve the asset’s upside potential while also earning stable staking rewards. The logic is simple—you're not abandoning your original assets, but rather making them work for you simultaneously.
For example, with USD1, this type of scheme allows you to maintain exposure to mainstream coins while earning continuous interest through stablecoins. Compared to simply holding coins and waiting or being forced into high-frequency trading, this "coin-to-coin" yield strategy provides many with a more controllable income channel.
The more macro uncertainty there is, the more the value of such prudent strategies is highlighted. The key is to find a sufficiently safe and stable-yielding plan to implement.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonRocketman
· 10h ago
Wait a minute, there's a problem with this logic... Minting stablecoins with collateral assets to earn interest, can the risk trade-off really be justified?
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 01-12 08:49
The logic of "Coin Sheng Coin" has been on my mind for a while. It feels a bit like splitting eggs into two baskets. But then again, in such uncertain market conditions, it's really necessary to think about how to be more stable.
View OriginalReply0
StakeTillRetire
· 01-12 08:49
The play of coin-to-coin generation sounds good, but the key still depends on the safety factor.
---
It's another round of stablecoin interest earning. The winner is whoever can survive until the end.
---
I just want to know where the risk of USD1 actually lies...
---
Deterministic returns—this term is just ridiculous in the crypto world.
---
Collateralizing BNB to mint stablecoins is like using the left hand and right hand, right?
---
When macro uncertainties arise, you have to look for certainty. This logic is sound; I'm just worried about choosing the wrong platform.
---
Who still dares to say stablecoins are stable? Haha.
---
Before generating coins, everyone should first understand the liquidation price.
---
This combo sounds very promising, but I'm just afraid of a sudden 0-1 scenario.
---
Would it be more reassuring to just hold coins and sleep instead of messing around?
View OriginalReply0
CoconutWaterBoy
· 01-12 08:46
Honestly, this move is quite interesting. Creating coins is definitely better than just sitting there and waiting to die.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 01-12 08:40
The "coin generation" scheme I've heard several times, and they all sound pretty good... but how many can truly consistently produce coins?
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCritic
· 01-12 08:33
Coin Sheng Coin sounds good, but the key is how to define "sufficiently secure"? Collateralization ratio, liquidation risk, the risk exposure of the stablecoin itself... these data need to be explained in detail.
In 2026, just at the start, the global financial markets have entered a new period of uncertainty. Interest rate policy adjustments, changes in central bank decisions, repeated policy expectations... These macro factors directly impact each investor's asset allocation. Whenever this happens, smart investors are doing the same thing: seeking deterministic returns.
Traditional financial markets are experiencing increased volatility, but in this environment, a certain type of strategy is gaining attention—earning interest on stablecoins to hedge against uncertainty. Instead of passively bearing risks during market turbulence, it’s better to allocate part of your funds to more stable yield strategies.
A recently discussed approach is: using mainstream assets (such as BNB, ETH) as collateral to mint interest-bearing stablecoins on-chain, which can preserve the asset’s upside potential while also earning stable staking rewards. The logic is simple—you're not abandoning your original assets, but rather making them work for you simultaneously.
For example, with USD1, this type of scheme allows you to maintain exposure to mainstream coins while earning continuous interest through stablecoins. Compared to simply holding coins and waiting or being forced into high-frequency trading, this "coin-to-coin" yield strategy provides many with a more controllable income channel.
The more macro uncertainty there is, the more the value of such prudent strategies is highlighted. The key is to find a sufficiently safe and stable-yielding plan to implement.