Right now, many AI Agents seem capable of running and thinking, but they are fundamentally "black boxes"—no one can predict what they will do. Would you dare to use such things in DeFi? Don't even think about it.
Recently, I noticed a different approach. Instead of making AI smarter, it's better to first teach it "discipline." What does this mean? It means setting clear boundaries and execution frameworks for AI, so that its actions in DeFi are traceable, controllable, and auditable. In other words, fundamentally solving the trust issue—not by believing how smart AI is, but by trusting how transparent its rules of action are.
This perspective is quite interesting. For AI to truly enter financial applications, what might be needed is not more powerful computing power, but stronger "discipline."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerLiquidated
· 7h ago
Nah, this is real talk. Using black-box AI to play DeFi is just gambler's mentality. I don't trust this at all.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 7h ago
Black box AI interacting with DeFi is truly a suicidal move; I agree with this view. Discipline is the key, and transparency and auditability are the future directions.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamer
· 7h ago
Oh, I like this idea... Black box AI colliding with DeFi is indeed a dead end. We should have understood this three years ago.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBot
· 7h ago
This approach really hits the nail on the head. Playing DeFi with black-box AI is indeed a gamble; a transparent and auditable framework is more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 8h ago
Black box AI colliding with DeFi? Ha, that's just asking for trouble. Discipline is indeed the lifesaver, and transparency is the true way to go.
Right now, many AI Agents seem capable of running and thinking, but they are fundamentally "black boxes"—no one can predict what they will do. Would you dare to use such things in DeFi? Don't even think about it.
Recently, I noticed a different approach. Instead of making AI smarter, it's better to first teach it "discipline." What does this mean? It means setting clear boundaries and execution frameworks for AI, so that its actions in DeFi are traceable, controllable, and auditable. In other words, fundamentally solving the trust issue—not by believing how smart AI is, but by trusting how transparent its rules of action are.
This perspective is quite interesting. For AI to truly enter financial applications, what might be needed is not more powerful computing power, but stronger "discipline."