Many people think that FLOKI's deflation is simply automatic burning, but that's not correct. Its deflation logic is much more complex, mainly following four paths: transaction tax recirculation, active buyback and burn, ecosystem consumption, and governance proposal burns.
Let's start with the transaction tax. FLOKI has buy and sell taxes on both Ethereum and BNB Chain, with specific rates determined by community governance, generally maintained around 3%. This tax does not disappear directly; instead, it flows into several directions: part of it is used for marketing promotion, part is invested in product and ecosystem development, another portion is used for buybacks and token burns, and the remaining supports liquidity building.
One important point to note — the transaction tax itself does not burn tokens. Its true function is to accumulate funds. With this money, the project team can buy back FLOKI from the market, and then burn the purchased tokens completely. This is the real mechanism behind deflation.
So rather than saying deflation is automatic, it’s better to say it is planned and paced. The transaction tax acts like "fuel" injected into the entire deflation system, and the subsequent buyback and burn are the actual ignition actions. Compared to a simple automatic burn, this design gives the project team more flexibility and control.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsShaman
· 17h ago
Oh right, someone finally explained it clearly. Previously, a bunch of people equated the 3% transaction tax with deflation, which is truly absurd.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManager
· 17h ago
It's all about perspective. Transaction taxes are just accumulation tools; true destruction is the core, and that's what constitutes a well-paced deflationary design.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobia
· 17h ago
Alright, finally someone has clarified this matter, it's not just about simple coin burning, it's more naive than that.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarber
· 17h ago
Oh wow, I didn't realize that FLOKI's gameplay is so deep, it's not just about burning coins.
Wait, with the project team having such flexibility and control, what if they decide to cut and run?
Honestly, it still depends on whether the community's influence is strong enough.
Many people think that FLOKI's deflation is simply automatic burning, but that's not correct. Its deflation logic is much more complex, mainly following four paths: transaction tax recirculation, active buyback and burn, ecosystem consumption, and governance proposal burns.
Let's start with the transaction tax. FLOKI has buy and sell taxes on both Ethereum and BNB Chain, with specific rates determined by community governance, generally maintained around 3%. This tax does not disappear directly; instead, it flows into several directions: part of it is used for marketing promotion, part is invested in product and ecosystem development, another portion is used for buybacks and token burns, and the remaining supports liquidity building.
One important point to note — the transaction tax itself does not burn tokens. Its true function is to accumulate funds. With this money, the project team can buy back FLOKI from the market, and then burn the purchased tokens completely. This is the real mechanism behind deflation.
So rather than saying deflation is automatic, it’s better to say it is planned and paced. The transaction tax acts like "fuel" injected into the entire deflation system, and the subsequent buyback and burn are the actual ignition actions. Compared to a simple automatic burn, this design gives the project team more flexibility and control.