2026-01-12 08:21:48

Recently, some internal market indicators have started flashing yellow lights, signaling a clear "risk appetite" signal. Interestingly, this thing is more accurate when viewed in reverse — those consumer stocks that are popular and thriving are soaring, precisely indicating that the market is betting on risk; while defensive staples stocks are falling, which instead hints that the market is avoiding something.

What does the data say? In the non-essential consumer sector, 79% of stocks are trading above the 200-day moving average, showing a clear upward trend. In contrast, the essential consumer sector is struggling, with only 35% of stocks trading above the 200-day moving average.

This polarization actually reflects an interesting market mentality — investors are voting with their feet, favoring risk assets while avoiding defensive assets. From the perspective of capital flow, this huge disparity within the consumer sector often serves as a precursor to changes in market sentiment. When risk appetite is so high, it either indicates that the market is very optimistic or that risk has accumulated quite a bit.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractFreelancer

· 18m ago

A comparison of 79% and 35% is indeed interesting; it feels like the market is betting big on a move. Looking at it from the opposite perspective is spot on—this kind of reverse thinking is just great. The segmentation in the consumer sector is so pronounced; you have to be careful—either overly optimistic or risks are already piled up. Only 35% of essential consumer goods are stable, and this situation feels a bit dangerous. Investors are indeed voting with their feet; the question is, where are they stepping? A yellow light flashes—hey, it's time to wake up. I don't quite understand the risk appetite for risk assets; anyway, blindly following the trend might not be wise, so keep a close eye on the data. This kind of polarization is often the calm before the storm—just wait and see. High risk appetite ≈ laying mines; smart people should have already reacted. With 79% of non-essential consumption back on track, the defensive group’s 35% seems to have been abandoned.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoComedian

· 14h ago

79% versus 35%, this gap, if it were on me, would be called "wealth gap," but in the market, it's called "risk singing." Laughing and then crying, investors vote with their feet by choosing consumer goods, but the result is the trap they dig themselves. So now, is the market especially lively or is the risk particularly fierce? This question is like asking me whether I'm truly happy or just laughing and crying—either way, there's no escape. If you ask me, given this polarization, the market is almost broadcasting "I'm placing a big bet." Data speaks for itself: 79% means "going all in," 35% means "chicken," and in between, there's a cut of the leek-cutting knife.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 14h ago

79 to 35, why is the gap so big... Feels a bit like gambler's mentality.

View OriginalReply0

LucidSleepwalker

· 14h ago

79% versus 35%, that gap is a bit scary, feels like something's going to happen --- Is it more accurate to look at it backwards? Alright, I got it. Next time I lose money, I’ll say I was operating in reverse --- With such severe consumption polarization, is the market too excited or is it疯狂积累风险 --- Stocks that are popular and luxurious are soaring... Why is my investment portfolio still falling? Did I choose the wrong ones? --- I'm really panicked about those defensive stocks dropping; feels like a storm is coming --- All the early warning signals have appeared, but no one is taking it seriously? This market is really a bit tricky --- The number 79% is a bit absolute; this is truly a泡沫信号

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagrant

· 14h ago

79% versus 35%, that gap is really huge... It feels like the market is betting big—either making a huge profit or exploding.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 14h ago

The yellow light is flashing, and you're still chasing risk assets. How optimistic must your mindset be... or how "brave" do you have to be?

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 14h ago

ngl the 79% vs 35% split is basically screaming "capital's fleeing quality" — textbook basis point inefficiency right there. when staples get this hollowed out, the opportunity cost becomes *chef's kiss* obvious... thesis validation incoming or capitulation imminent, no inbetween tbh

Reply0

DefiPlaybook

· 14h ago

A 79% to 35% difference is quite harsh; market sentiment is overly optimistic... Based on the historical performance of such indicators, the more polarized the divergence, the more intense the rebound. Risks either erupt explosively or settle quietly, with no middle ground.

View OriginalReply0