A major trading platform has indicated it might reassess backing the CLARITY Act should the bill expand beyond transparency mandates to restrict stablecoin yield mechanisms.
This conditional stance raises an interesting question: would stricter regulatory frameworks reshape how stablecoins compete in the market? The answer likely hinges on whether new rules level the playing field or entrench existing advantages.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
tx_pending_forever
· 7h ago
Are there new rules for cutting leeks again? These exchanges just know how to turn hostile
---
Stablecoin yields are being restricted, how do leading platforms still have a say
---
Wait, it's both regulation and yield restrictions? Who benefits from this
---
Basically, they're afraid of breaking the existing pattern
---
As soon as the new rules come out, they change their tune. Business is so hard to run
---
If stablecoin yields disappear, no one will use it. This logic makes sense
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHole
· 7h ago
Using the same old tricks? Cutting yield just reduces competitiveness. Big players remain big, while retail investors are still being harvested.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMaster
· 7h ago
Coming back to do this again? Exchanges are all old foxes; politely called "conditional support," but actually just protecting their own interests.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamer
· 8h ago
Are stablecoin yield mechanisms being restricted? This way, major platforms will have to turn hostile.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 8h ago
Playing that "conditional support" trick again? Basically, once yield is involved, they turn hostile. These exchanges are truly hopeless.
A major trading platform has indicated it might reassess backing the CLARITY Act should the bill expand beyond transparency mandates to restrict stablecoin yield mechanisms.
This conditional stance raises an interesting question: would stricter regulatory frameworks reshape how stablecoins compete in the market? The answer likely hinges on whether new rules level the playing field or entrench existing advantages.