After catching the eye of a major exchange, it looks like the project lead pivoted entirely—abandoning the grassroots community-driven approach that initially gained traction. Instead of doubling down through public promotion, hosting community sessions, and sustaining the long-term vision, the focus completely shifted elsewhere. The transition essentially meant stepping back from what made the project compelling to its early supporters.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 01-12 08:03
Damn, this is a typical case of taking the exchange's money and forgetting the original faith.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 01-12 07:54
Old tricks... As soon as they get on the exchange, they change faces and treat the community as if they have completely abandoned their original intentions. The charm that once built the grassroots has instantly disappeared, and now it only smells like cashing out.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fish
· 01-12 07:51
Same old story, as soon as they see an exchange, they start forgetting their roots. I've seen many projects like this.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196
· 01-12 07:41
It's the same old trick. Once they get on major exchanges, they become arrogant. What do they think the community is? It's really just the real world.
After catching the eye of a major exchange, it looks like the project lead pivoted entirely—abandoning the grassroots community-driven approach that initially gained traction. Instead of doubling down through public promotion, hosting community sessions, and sustaining the long-term vision, the focus completely shifted elsewhere. The transition essentially meant stepping back from what made the project compelling to its early supporters.