2026-01-12 07:31:06

Pump platform has recently launched several substantial product optimizations, especially regarding the creator ecosystem and developer incentives. The most core improvement is the upgrade of the fee distribution mechanism—creators can now allocate earnings to up to 10 addresses, with each address's share set independently. This design allows KOLs to collaborate and share profits with the community more flexibly, and also provides CTOs and contributors with a direct incentive channel, no longer a one-way profit distribution. Additionally, the platform now supports token ownership transfer, enabling creators to relinquish their profit-sharing rights when necessary, giving participants more autonomy. From the overall ecosystem perspective, these changes all point in one direction—making platform profit distribution more transparent and diversified.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearEatsAll

· 18h ago

Oh no, dividends for ten addresses? Now KOLs can really have fun. This is true decentralization, no need to look at the platform's face anymore. Flexible distribution mechanism is flexible, but I'm worried someone might play black box... Finally able to shift the blame to the community, smart. Can ownership be transferred? Should I be happy or worried? Compared to other platforms, this is indeed an improvement, but how long can it last? Another good news, let's see if it can be implemented. Real transparency still depends on the community watching, can't trust everything. This update is quite sincere, thumbs up.

View OriginalReply0

MissedAirdropAgain

· 18h ago

This update really seems thoughtful, the division mechanism is much more flexible --- Ten addresses allocated? This makes it easier to cut leeks haha --- Autonomy sounds good, but how many people actually use it in practice? --- Wait, what does it mean that token ownership can be transferred? What can this do? --- Finally no longer one-way sheep herding, a bit more conscience --- I just want to know what real benefits this has for ordinary users... No airdrops, right? --- Transparency and diversification, in nice words it’s just about wanting to keep KOLs, isn’t it? --- Feels like a remedy for previous design flaws --- How the money is divided is still decided by the big players, don’t fool yourself --- This update is indeed better, much more conscientious than some platforms

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusDissenter

· 18h ago

Wow, ten addresses allocated? Now KOLs can really have fun. The profit-sharing mechanism is finally less shady, but can transferring ownership really prevent exit scams... Can the yield rights be abandoned? Feels like either decentralizing power or setting a trap. Wow, is this learning from Uniswap or genuinely aiming for a transparent ecosystem? The fee distribution system sounds good, but will it just be a data game in practice? Diversified distribution sounds nice, but I'm worried it might just be a benefit for big players. Finally, there's a somewhat decent incentive mechanism, but let's wait and see. This operation is interesting, but how long the ecosystem can survive is the real key.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetScholar

· 18h ago

Finally, a platform is thinking about taking care of developers. This move definitely has some substance. Distributed to 10 addresses? This way, CTOs no longer have to worry about KOL's opinions. Nice. Basically, it's shifting from one-sided profit-taking to a mutually beneficial approach. It's finally a bit more humane. This distribution logic should have been implemented long ago. Pump's realization now isn't too late. The permission transfer part is interesting, giving participants a say. The success of the ecosystem depends on execution. Diversified distribution sounds good, but I'm worried it might just become a new way to cut corners.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHermit

· 18h ago

Wow, now that's what I call understanding the ecosystem --- Ten address allocations? Giving KOLs autonomy directly, that's a good move --- Wait, giving up revenue permissions? That's interesting, flexibility has indeed increased --- Talking about transparency and diversification sounds nice, but it all depends on how it's implemented... --- CTO incentive channel? Finally not just one-way profit-taking, huh --- Upgrading the distribution mechanism sounds comfortable, but how's the user experience? --- Is this a serious attempt to build an ecosystem or just another marketing stunt? I'm a bit skeptical --- Setting up ten independent addresses, a bit complicated, might be hard to use --- Token ownership transfer, okay, at least it provides an exit right --- Diversified distribution, honestly, it still depends on how big players play

View OriginalReply0