#比特币价格分析 Seeing Generation Z treat Bitcoin as a Christmas gift, what flashed through my mind was the frenzy of 2021. Wyatt Johnson spent 5,000 yuan to buy Solana back then, only to see it halve in value within a few months. Now, at 22 years old, he's still willing to receive crypto gifts—this shift in mindset is quite interesting.
Over a cycle of more than ten years, I've seen many such stories. Each wave of new capital entering the market is accompanied by similar narratives: this time is different, witnessing history, missing out means regret. But the real watershed is here—this generation has experienced the full correction from 2021 to 2024, and they've learned to distinguish between "technological faith" and "asset allocation."
Looking at Russell Kai's choices in the reports makes it clear. He's open but cautious, leaning more towards stocks than crypto. Clay Lute also admits that, compared to Bitcoin, investing in a Roth IRA is more beneficial for long-term finances. It's not that they don't understand crypto; under economic pressure, what they need is predictability and stability—which is exactly what Bitcoin lacks.
The most ironic data point is: Bitcoin dropped from 126,000 to 81,000, a 35% decline, essentially wiping out the year's gains. The voices predicting 250,000 have all disappeared. This is the truth of the cycle. The new generation isn't resistant to change; they are just more realistic—since traditional wealth accumulation paths are blocked, it doesn't mean they have to gamble on crypto. They want options that match risk and reward, not a gamble.
From a certain perspective, giving crypto as a gift reflects this generation's clarity: accept it, but don't rely on it.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#比特币价格分析 Seeing Generation Z treat Bitcoin as a Christmas gift, what flashed through my mind was the frenzy of 2021. Wyatt Johnson spent 5,000 yuan to buy Solana back then, only to see it halve in value within a few months. Now, at 22 years old, he's still willing to receive crypto gifts—this shift in mindset is quite interesting.
Over a cycle of more than ten years, I've seen many such stories. Each wave of new capital entering the market is accompanied by similar narratives: this time is different, witnessing history, missing out means regret. But the real watershed is here—this generation has experienced the full correction from 2021 to 2024, and they've learned to distinguish between "technological faith" and "asset allocation."
Looking at Russell Kai's choices in the reports makes it clear. He's open but cautious, leaning more towards stocks than crypto. Clay Lute also admits that, compared to Bitcoin, investing in a Roth IRA is more beneficial for long-term finances. It's not that they don't understand crypto; under economic pressure, what they need is predictability and stability—which is exactly what Bitcoin lacks.
The most ironic data point is: Bitcoin dropped from 126,000 to 81,000, a 35% decline, essentially wiping out the year's gains. The voices predicting 250,000 have all disappeared. This is the truth of the cycle. The new generation isn't resistant to change; they are just more realistic—since traditional wealth accumulation paths are blocked, it doesn't mean they have to gamble on crypto. They want options that match risk and reward, not a gamble.
From a certain perspective, giving crypto as a gift reflects this generation's clarity: accept it, but don't rely on it.