A few days ago, I was chatting with a friend who works in development. He’s been exploring BNB staking issues lately and seems to have discovered quite a few insights.



Speaking of staking, many people have tried it. The yields look pretty good, but once your coins are locked in, you can’t move them. When a bull market arrives, others’ assets are appreciating, while your BNB just earns some basic returns in the staking pool—it's a bit disappointing.

He mentioned an idea—using a liquidity staking protocol to turn BNB into a token called slisBNB. Simply put, this token can continuously earn staking rewards while maintaining liquidity, allowing you to use it for collateralized loans.

The key point is the borrowing cost. By using slisBNB as collateral to borrow stablecoins, the annualized interest rate is only 0.03%—this fee is even lower than typical withdrawal fees. The borrowed stablecoins can then be put into yield protocols, achieving an annualized return of around 20%. This creates a profit margin through the arbitrage. Plus, with the original staking rewards from BNB, the overall annualized return can reach over 27%.

Of course, this kind of operation isn’t without risks. A significant drop in collateral prices could lead to liquidation pressure, and platforms holding stablecoins also carry risks. However, data shows that top-tier protocols with such TVL have already reached hundreds of billions of dollars, and their auditing and risk control systems are relatively mature.
BNB-1,3%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiHeirvip
· 7h ago
It should be pointed out that this set of operations looks impressive but actually contains three fallacies — on-chain data shows that liquidation risk has been systematically underestimated. --- 27% annualized? Laughable, this is another carnival for new retail investors. I have verified all historical data, and in 2017, it was also hyped like this. --- The liquidity premium of slisBNB will eventually be arbitraged away, and then the entire revenue structure will collapse. Undoubtedly. --- Friend, have you calculated the liquidation waterfall under extreme market conditions? Or have you been fooled again by the TVL size? --- According to the logic in the white paper, the essence of stablecoin yields is essentially borrowing from the future. Don’t be blinded by 27%. --- Let’s return to the core of technology: zero borrowing costs are not an advantage, but a sedative given by the market. --- It’s obvious this is a shell game; the risk is hidden in every link of the interest rate spread.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 7h ago
27% annualized return sounds comfortable, but when it comes to actually taking action, I start to hesitate. Liquidation may sound easy to talk about, but when it really happens, it's a painful lesson.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatchervip
· 7h ago
27% annualized? This spread looks tempting, but I just don't know how big the liquidation risk really is...
View OriginalReply0
TestnetFreeloadervip
· 7h ago
27%? That number sounds comfortable, but I keep feeling that something's not right... Can we really be assured about the liquidation risk?
View OriginalReply0
ProposalDetectivevip
· 7h ago
27% annualized? Sounds pretty tempting, but how many actually earn this much steadily...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwicevip
· 8h ago
27% annualized return sounds pretty attractive, but buddy, do you dare to leverage so much in this round? I don't have that courage.
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者vip
· 8h ago
27% annualized? That number sounds great, but I always feel a bit skeptical. How is that 20% return on stablecoins achieved?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)