2026-01-12 03:27:44

Looking back at 2024, $WIF was undoubtedly the spark that ignited the meme coin frenzy. At that time, most people chose to stay on the sidelines — the reason was simple, "Market cap is too high." And what happened? This guy managed to reach a valuation of $4 billion.

This event leaves an interesting question. The more often a judgment is "no chance," the more likely it is to become a regret later. Those who said the market cap was already saturated ended up staring blankly at the upward price charts.

Now, in 2026, the market is asking again: Can $WHITEWHALE replicate this story? Can it become the next meme narrative trigger?

This is not just about how much a coin's price can rise. More deeply, when everyone learns to look at market cap, calculate probabilities, and judge "reasonableness," true opportunities are often hidden in places that are collectively dismissed. History always repeats itself — until it no longer does.

WIF16,72%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractFreelancer

· 17h ago

Here we go again with the same rhetoric. I saw that wave of WIF, but do you still want to copy now? The market has already learned to be smart. --- Basically, it's a gambling mentality. No one really dares to go all-in on something that's been rejected. --- WHITEWHALE? Let's see the community's enthusiasm first. That's not something history can decide. --- Every time they talk about the next WIF, 99% of them end up zero... That logic is flawed. --- Got it, got it. It's about reverse operation, but when too many people do the opposite, it stops working. --- Market cap saturation is a weak excuse, but that doesn't mean every coin can multiply 40 times. These are two different things. --- Now even newbies are starting to talk about "opportunities in rejected areas." This signal... isn't very good.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerGas

· 01-12 03:56

Honestly, those still obsessing over market cap are probably the ones who missed out on $WIF last year. Getting proven wrong once and still trying to use the same logic is truly unbelievable. Who knows if $WHITEWHALE can fly, but the "market cap is too high" curse definitely needs to be broken.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomHunter

· 01-12 03:55

Is this the same old story, thinking you can avoid pitfalls by looking at market cap and calculating probabilities? That's funny. People who missed $WIF are still making up stories; can $WHITEWHALE really turn things around? I don't believe it. Is there an opportunity where everyone collectively denies it? Then why are most people still losing? This time is truly different; the market has already learned to be smart. That wave of $WIF was purely luck; don't mistake survivor bias for a pattern. It sounds good, but in reality, it's just gambler's psychology at work.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-12 03:54

I think this paragraph is just hinting that we've all learned to be smarter, but we're still the same fools. WIF indeed slapped many people in the face, but now everyone is talking about "opportunities in denial"... Isn't this itself becoming a new consensus? I don't know if WHITEWHALE is popular or not, but betting on "things that are denied" has now become the biggest consensus. The real bettors have long kept quiet, and those speaking out are all outsiders. Stop talking about probability and rationality here; frankly, it's just gambler psychology at work.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-12 03:52

Here comes another "Next WIF," brothers, don't get cut again To be honest, that wave of WIF really slapped a lot of people in the face But WHITEWHALE? Uh... I need to look at the fundamentals first Is there always an opportunity where everyone collectively denies? This logic kind of feels like reverse cutting the leeks Regarding market cap saturation, it's indeed easy to overlook, but blindly following the trend is even more likely to lead to liquidation Wait, this sentence sounds a bit off to me—"History repeats until it no longer repeats"? Then how can we trade?

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 01-12 03:46

WIF I really underestimated it. RSI hasn't even shown overbought signals before it took off. Looking back now at the Bollinger Band angle coefficient... Damn, this is the real escape velocity. WHITEWHALE now, whether the fuel is enough is the key. Don't be fooled by market cap; the launch window often hides in places labeled "hopeless" by others. History repeats itself until it no longer does. That hit hard. I'm the unlucky one calculating the probabilities.

View OriginalReply0