2026-01-12 03:25:13

Top-tier crypto projects actually need dev teams that can balance contradictory strategies. It's not about being inconsistent—it's about having the flexibility to shift between different approaches depending on market conditions and community needs. Teams that can adapt their priorities, communication style, and roadmap execution without losing credibility tend to perform better long-term. This kind of strategic duality separates the coins that survive bear markets from those that fade away.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

tx_or_didn't_happen

· 4h ago

Honestly, a dev team that can adapt on the fly will last longer, while rigid ones will eventually be淘汰.

View OriginalReply0

PermabullPete

· 17h ago

ngl that's why most projects fail. They call it "flexibility," but really it's just changing direction recklessly without principles.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropNinja

· 19h ago

Nah, isn't this just the language of the client? Anyway, no matter what we do, we can always shift the blame to the market.

View OriginalReply0

GasWrangler

· 19h ago

nah tbh this reads like cope for poor planning... if you need "strategic duality" maybe your base layer architecture just wasn't optimized from the start? analyze the actual on-chain data and you'll see the projects that survive don't pivot—they execute with precision. shifting narratives is gas inefficient fr

Reply0

NFTArchaeologis

· 19h ago

In essence, projects that survive a bear market are all doing the same thing—precisely grasping the rhythm of the times like a cultural relic restorer. Contradictory strategies are not wavering, but a form of restrained wisdom.

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer