#美国贸易赤字状况 🔍 The Road to Correcting Incentive Mechanisms



Over the years, a contradiction has been evident on a leading MEME coin platform: it charges based on market capitalization tiers, which has ironically encouraged a flood of low-risk, low-quality tokens. The data is startling—about 98.6% of projects ultimately become "exit scam" projects, while those high-risk traders who actually bring liquidity and trading volume to the platform do not receive the rewards they deserve.

The platform’s core figures are frank: traders are the lifeblood of the platform. If the incentive mechanisms deviate from them, the health of the market will inevitably decline.

📝 Step-by-step Reform Plan

The newly launched multi-wallet fee sharing feature breaks the traditional distribution model. Creators can allocate fees to up to 10 wallets, and it also supports transferring token ownership and revoking update permissions. This design directly addresses a pain point—lack of transparency in project team allocations. Fees can be claimed at any time and never expire, which helps alleviate creators’ immediate cash-out pressure and encourages long-term development.

More critical reforms are still in the pipeline. The platform has announced an upcoming market-based fee decision mechanism, allowing traders to decide whether a token’s narrative is worth supporting with creator fees. This is not just a feature upgrade but a fundamental reshaping of the mechanism—shifting the incentive focus from token issuers to market participants, enabling the market to filter out truly high-quality projects on its own.

📊 Reality Echoes

After the reform announcement, the platform’s native token responded noticeably, rising over 10% at one point. Recent trading data is also impressive—on January 6th, it hit a record daily trading volume of $2.03 billion. But on the other hand, the platform still faces a $500 million lawsuit and other challenges. These pressures highlight the urgency of the reform.

Ultimately, this reform aims to solve the fundamental contradiction within the MEME coin ecosystem: the proliferation of tokens with low quality. The platform is shifting from simply pursuing issuance volume to guiding resource flow through mechanism design toward projects that truly generate trading and liquidity. This is a difficult transformation from "creating tokens" to "cultivating markets." The success or failure of this effort will directly impact the platform’s long-term prospects. $DOGE $SHIB
DOGE-2,5%
SHIB-3,13%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerProfitvip
· 9h ago
98.6% exit rate is an astonishing number; no wonder the platform has to get serious. However, whether this wave of reform can truly reverse the ecosystem depends on whether traders buy into it.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHuntervip
· 9h ago
98.6% exit scam rate—this data is truly shocking. To be honest, it was entirely due to the previous mechanism's reverse incentives, encouraging the proliferation of worthless tokens. Genuine traders end up being exploited instead. Who designed this logic...
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.ethvip
· 9h ago
98.6% exit rate, this number is outrageous... feels like it's time to cut it off.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)