Recently, there has been a noticeable change in the circle. The once-popular meme coins and small-cap tokens are losing their heat, replaced by an increasingly frequent term — institutional funds.



This is not hype. Once traditional financial institutions really start entering the market on a large scale, they will bring more than just short-term trading. These major players managing hundreds of billions or even trillions of assets are looking for: the safest, most compliant, and most secure options. Assets that make them feel at ease.

So the question is: who will institutions choose?

Today, I want to discuss a project — Dusk. It may not be the most well-known, but it is very likely to be exactly the ideal target for institutions.

**Balancing Compliance and Privacy**

Think from a different perspective: if you are a decision-maker at a Wall Street investment bank, managing huge funds. Now someone asks you to publish all transaction records, client information, and asset flows on the chain, so everyone can check at any time — would you agree?

Obviously not. This is the biggest concern for traditional institutions entering blockchain — they need the efficiency and transparency of blockchain, but cannot accept all data being exposed.

Dusk’s innovation lies here. It uses zero-knowledge proof technology to build a clever system: the chain is public, but transaction details and position data can be selectively hidden. Only authorized regulatory agencies and compliance institutions can view them. For institutions, this is essentially a tailored security solution.

**Why not other public chains?**

Solana is fast, Ethereum has a large ecosystem, BNB has many users. Each of these public chains has its advantages. But none of them have solved the same problem: providing privacy protection for institutional-grade users while maintaining openness. This is Dusk’s unique value. As institutional funds flow in, this demand will only grow stronger.
DUSK-4,8%
SOL2,95%
ETH5,82%
BNB2,96%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquiditySurfervip
· 01-12 03:57
Talking again about institutional entry, compliance, and privacy—sounds reasonable, but it seems everyone is saying the same thing. Dusk is indeed interesting; I need to look more into zero-knowledge proofs. But who dares to claim they're the "ideal target" for institutions right now... Wait, isn't this logic reversed? If institutions really come in, would they even care about privacy?
View OriginalReply0
MintMastervip
· 01-12 02:53
Institutional entry indeed changes the flavor, but the logic of Dusk's zero-knowledge proof... to be honest, I still have some reservations. It feels like the old routine again; anyone can tell a compliant story.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocityvip
· 01-12 02:52
Zero-knowledge proofs sound complicated, but basically, institutions want to secretly make money while pretending to be compliant. Dusk's approach really hits the pain point. --- The meme coins are dead, institutions are here, and it doesn't feel as fun anymore. --- Wait, privacy protection + regulatory compliance, aren't these two inherently contradictory? Can Dusk really achieve both? --- Those old foxes on Wall Street want everything. Why can Dusk satisfy them? Can't other public chains do this? --- Honestly, compared to Solana and Ethereum, not many people know about Dusk. Do institutions really pick a small transparent project? --- Balancing compliance and privacy... sounds like marketing jargon, but it indeed hits the dead end of traditional finance. --- If institutional funds really come in, small coin projects should give up. The entire track is about to change.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 01-12 02:52
Wait, will institutions really feel comfortable using ZK to hide data? I feel like this logic is a bit counterintuitive... Regulatory authorities need to see it, but ordinary people can't, doesn't this become a new black box?
View OriginalReply0
degenwhisperervip
· 01-12 02:40
Institutions came, memes died, I agree with this logic
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofstervip
· 01-12 02:26
technically speaking, the "selective transparency" pitch is nice on paper but... let's be real about the implementation details here. who's actually auditing the zk proofs? because "only authorized parties can peek" sounds awfully close to "we built a backdoor and called it compliance"
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)