Recently, I noticed that a major exchange has made adjustments to event contracts—originally allowing users to place 5 orders simultaneously, now changed to one order at a time, with each order limited to 5U and odds maintained at 100%. This move is quite interesting.
From the platform's perspective, this is definitely risk control. After all, if users place too many orders at once, it can easily lead to large losses, followed by various complaints and public opinion. Switching to small, single orders indeed reduces the frequency of extreme situations.
But on the other hand, this change instantly shifts user experience from "free player" to "5U War God." Although the official explanation is to encourage rational participation and prevent overexcitement, it also effectively locks in each user's participation limit. Want to increase activity? This move might instead make some users feel their space is being squeezed.
What's more interesting is that such frequent mechanism adjustments often shake market confidence in the platform. After all, rules changing repeatedly can make users feel that the platform is "manipulating arbitrarily." This kind of unstable expectation impacts overall confidence in the ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWitch
· 13h ago
The reputation of 5U War God really can't hold up anymore, this is just disguised fundraising.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDay
· 13h ago
5U War God is starting to hold on a bit, this is basically a disguised way of harvesting the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 13h ago
They're changing the rules again, this time players are directly turned into "trapped" players. What's a single 5U bet worth? It could be gone in minutes.
View OriginalReply0
DaoTherapy
· 13h ago
5U War God sounds pretty good, anyway we're all losing money, so why not put some restrictions?
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkeptic
· 13h ago
The 5U restriction is really a double-edged sword. While it controls the risk, users also leave, which is called shooting oneself in the foot.
View OriginalReply0
SurvivorshipBias
· 13h ago
Here comes that "for your good" excuse again, isn't it just fear of being smashed? The 5U restriction essentially locks the ceiling, and in fact, activity levels will drop. This logic is truly baffling.
Recently, I noticed that a major exchange has made adjustments to event contracts—originally allowing users to place 5 orders simultaneously, now changed to one order at a time, with each order limited to 5U and odds maintained at 100%. This move is quite interesting.
From the platform's perspective, this is definitely risk control. After all, if users place too many orders at once, it can easily lead to large losses, followed by various complaints and public opinion. Switching to small, single orders indeed reduces the frequency of extreme situations.
But on the other hand, this change instantly shifts user experience from "free player" to "5U War God." Although the official explanation is to encourage rational participation and prevent overexcitement, it also effectively locks in each user's participation limit. Want to increase activity? This move might instead make some users feel their space is being squeezed.
What's more interesting is that such frequent mechanism adjustments often shake market confidence in the platform. After all, rules changing repeatedly can make users feel that the platform is "manipulating arbitrarily." This kind of unstable expectation impacts overall confidence in the ecosystem.