2026-01-12 02:20:33

#以太坊大户持仓变化 Ethereum's recent trend is quite interesting. My view is to stay cautiously optimistic, and gradual entry would be more prudent. The range between 3120 and 3125 is a good entry point; once it breaks above 3135 (the upper band of the Bollinger Bands), consider adding some positions.

Regarding risk control—it's recommended to set the stop-loss at 3090, which provides about a 3.1% loss margin, below the main support at 3095. On the return side, the first target is 3160, offering a 2.5% profit; if holding strength is higher, the second target is 3180, corresponding to a 4.5% increase. Overall, this move requires patience to wait for confirmation signals; avoid rushing into the market.

ETH3,21%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

alpha_leaker

· 22h ago

Batch building positions, we've all heard of this, but the key is still to wait for confirmation signals.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-12 02:50

Entering at 3120? I think we should wait a bit longer; the signal hasn't been fully confirmed yet. --- The upper band of the Bollinger Bands just like? I've seen this trick too many times, and in the end, chasing highs results in getting crushed. --- Setting the stop loss at 3090 is a good move, just afraid that human nature can't beat technical analysis haha. --- Gradually building positions is the right approach. Anyway, in this market this year, whoever rushes will die. Taking it slow is faster. --- Is a 4.5% target too conservative? It feels like there's potential in this wave. --- Waiting for confirmation signals, it's easy to say... every time it's just wait and see, and in the end, we miss out. --- Both targets at 3160 and 3180 look promising, just not sure if they can be reached.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-a180694b

· 01-12 02:49

The 3120 level is indeed worth paying attention to, but I still think there's no need to rush; it depends on the trading volume to confirm.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer

· 01-12 02:47

The 3120-3125 wave is indeed tempting, but I still need to wait for a confirmation signal before making a move. --- The idea of building positions gradually is good, but I'm worried it might turn into chasing highs again. --- A stop-loss at 3090 provides enough buffer; the key is whether we can really break above 3135. --- Patience... sounds easy, but in actual trading, that's the hardest part. --- Breaking through the upper band of the Bollinger Bands feels like the real entry point; the previous moves were just tests. --- The target range of 2.5% to 4.5% is conservative, but we must admit that the risk is indeed controllable. --- I can't hold on; I always want to jump in before 3120, and then I get caught. --- I like this logic, but I'm afraid of missing out on quick gains from chasing the rally later, which can easily shake your confidence.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-0717ab66

· 01-12 02:46

I think the 3120 level is doable, but don't go all in at once... Buying in batches is the way to go; it's not too late to follow if 3135 breaks... Tight stop-loss at 3090 is a bit risky; I prefer 3085 for a more comfortable mindset... This market trend is a test of patience; those who rush in early are all trapped... 2.5% profit? That's not enough, let's push for 3180...

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofster

· 01-12 02:41

look, technically speaking the risk-reward here is... actually pretty reasonable if you're patient enough. 3.1% downside for 4.5% upside? that's the kind of asymmetry people sleep on. but nah, most will fomo in before the confirmation signal anyway lol

Reply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-12 02:22

Based on on-chain data, I agree with the logic of the 3120-3125 build-up zone, but to be honest, a 3.1% stop-loss space is a bit tight... The question is, where does the large holder position change data come from? What basis is used to judge and confirm that the signal has arrived? Regarding the Bollinger Band upper band at 3135, a clarification on the sample period is needed—4 hours or daily? The key is, what is the historical win rate that this risk control framework is benchmarked against... A target profit of 2.5%-4.5% seems stable, but in actual operation, the drawdown probability is underestimated. It is recommended to cross-verify again from the trading volume dimension.

View OriginalReply0