I often see creators complaining about a pain point in Web3: data storage has become a major challenge when developing NFT projects or on-chain games.
The previous approaches were basically two, and neither was satisfactory. One was to put everything on the public chain, but the high gas fees and storage costs made people feel it's unaffordable—it's like piling up clutter in a land of limited space, wasting money. The other was to directly upload data to centralized servers like Amazon AWS, which seems convenient on the surface, but the problem is: if these companies experience a power outage or shut down, your carefully crafted NFT and game data are gone, and your efforts are lost.
Now, Walrus has changed this situation. From a different perspective, it’s like a Costco warehouse service in the Web3 world. The core mechanism is simple: break your data into small pieces and store them across various nodes worldwide. The benefits are obvious—much cheaper rent and complete decentralization. Even if some nodes in a certain region encounter issues, data fragments from other locations are enough to reconstruct the entire file, greatly enhancing security and availability.
Why is Walrus so critical to the SUI ecosystem? Frankly, without an affordable and easy-to-use data storage solution, Web3 applications can't innovate beyond a certain point—they'll just spin in circles with word games. The emergence of Walrus fills this gap, providing developers with the fundamental infrastructure support to build and scale their applications.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiPlaybook
· 23h ago
According to data, current public chain storage costs are indeed being eaten up by gas fees within the range of 60%-80%. Walrus's distributed architecture theoretically can reduce this by over 80%, but the key issue is whether the node incentive mechanism can be maintained in the long term...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationKing
· 01-12 02:50
Really, both of those paths were traps... the gas fees are unbearable, and centralized systems are always worrying me.
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectual
· 01-12 02:37
Someone should have addressed this issue earlier; the gas fees are indeed a huge pitfall.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistaker
· 01-12 02:25
Oh no, someone finally said it—the gas fees are really a meat grinder.
I need to think more about Walrus's decentralized storage logic. It sounds reliable, but can it actually run?
AWS definitely caused quite a few people to get stuck before; shutting down directly leads to game over, which is too outrageous.
Decentralized storage should have been taken seriously a long time ago. It's not easy for the SUI ecosystem to get off the ground.
Feels like another "theory is perfect but practically difficult to use" thing. I'm skeptical and watching cautiously.
View OriginalReply0
DEXRobinHood
· 01-12 02:24
The gas fee system really drained people, and AWS's approach is even more outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 01-12 02:23
Someone finally solved the storage headache, I was really driven crazy by gas fees before.
I often see creators complaining about a pain point in Web3: data storage has become a major challenge when developing NFT projects or on-chain games.
The previous approaches were basically two, and neither was satisfactory. One was to put everything on the public chain, but the high gas fees and storage costs made people feel it's unaffordable—it's like piling up clutter in a land of limited space, wasting money. The other was to directly upload data to centralized servers like Amazon AWS, which seems convenient on the surface, but the problem is: if these companies experience a power outage or shut down, your carefully crafted NFT and game data are gone, and your efforts are lost.
Now, Walrus has changed this situation. From a different perspective, it’s like a Costco warehouse service in the Web3 world. The core mechanism is simple: break your data into small pieces and store them across various nodes worldwide. The benefits are obvious—much cheaper rent and complete decentralization. Even if some nodes in a certain region encounter issues, data fragments from other locations are enough to reconstruct the entire file, greatly enhancing security and availability.
Why is Walrus so critical to the SUI ecosystem? Frankly, without an affordable and easy-to-use data storage solution, Web3 applications can't innovate beyond a certain point—they'll just spin in circles with word games. The emergence of Walrus fills this gap, providing developers with the fundamental infrastructure support to build and scale their applications.