Source: BlockMedia
Original Title: Does Venezuela’s example reveal the limitations of stablecoins? “Only Bitcoin is a sovereign asset”
Original Link:
Structural Limitations of Stablecoins
The freezing incident involving Tether(USDT) used in Venezuela’s crude oil export settlements has drawn attention, highlighting the structural differences between auditable digital assets and Bitcoin.
Analysts point out that since 2020, the Maduro regime has used USDT based on the TRON network to evade sanctions, involving billions of dollars in transactions. However, after U.S. intervention, Tether froze the relevant wallets, immediately blocking the funds.
This case reveals a core lesson: Stablecoins may be useful in crises, but because they have issuers and compliance frameworks, they can be controlled at any time.
“Useful but without sovereignty” - Evaluation of stablecoins
Analysts compare USDT to a “dollar pipeline without SWIFT”—faster and cheaper, but still with a CEO and compliance organizations that must respond to political pressure. In Caracas, there are even cases of elderly people paying management fees with USDT, but the key point is: Usefulness and sovereignty are two different things.
“If someone can freeze it, then it’s not money,” analysts say. This incident publicly proves that stablecoins cannot guarantee national-level financial sovereignty.
The Differentiated Advantage of Bitcoin: Permissionless Final Settlement
From a game theory perspective, countries like Iran and Russia, responding to the weaponization of the dollar, face limited options:
USDT: proven to be freezeable
Renminbi: subject to political restrictions
Gold: difficult to conduct large-scale, rapid international settlements
Central Bank Digital Currency(CBDC): offers stronger control measures
The only asset that meets the following conditions is Bitcoin:
✓ Supports final settlement
✓ Fixed supply(21 million coins)
✓ No freezing mechanism
✓ No controlling entity
✓ No CEO, architecture that can be stopped with a single phone call
This incident has been called “Bitcoin’s best free advertisement”—the largest and most urgent capital has learned its lesson. Although this realization has not yet been fully reflected in the price, the market will eventually respond.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Benesuera USDT Freeze Event: The Sovereignty Dilemma of Stablecoins and the Differences with Bitcoin
Source: BlockMedia Original Title: Does Venezuela’s example reveal the limitations of stablecoins? “Only Bitcoin is a sovereign asset” Original Link:
Structural Limitations of Stablecoins
The freezing incident involving Tether(USDT) used in Venezuela’s crude oil export settlements has drawn attention, highlighting the structural differences between auditable digital assets and Bitcoin.
Analysts point out that since 2020, the Maduro regime has used USDT based on the TRON network to evade sanctions, involving billions of dollars in transactions. However, after U.S. intervention, Tether froze the relevant wallets, immediately blocking the funds.
This case reveals a core lesson: Stablecoins may be useful in crises, but because they have issuers and compliance frameworks, they can be controlled at any time.
“Useful but without sovereignty” - Evaluation of stablecoins
Analysts compare USDT to a “dollar pipeline without SWIFT”—faster and cheaper, but still with a CEO and compliance organizations that must respond to political pressure. In Caracas, there are even cases of elderly people paying management fees with USDT, but the key point is: Usefulness and sovereignty are two different things.
“If someone can freeze it, then it’s not money,” analysts say. This incident publicly proves that stablecoins cannot guarantee national-level financial sovereignty.
The Differentiated Advantage of Bitcoin: Permissionless Final Settlement
From a game theory perspective, countries like Iran and Russia, responding to the weaponization of the dollar, face limited options:
The only asset that meets the following conditions is Bitcoin:
✓ Supports final settlement
✓ Fixed supply(21 million coins)
✓ No freezing mechanism
✓ No controlling entity
✓ No CEO, architecture that can be stopped with a single phone call
This incident has been called “Bitcoin’s best free advertisement”—the largest and most urgent capital has learned its lesson. Although this realization has not yet been fully reflected in the price, the market will eventually respond.