If the team had been transparent from day one about building on Solana, plenty of us would've made different decisions. The chain choice matters more than most projects want to admit—it affects everything from transaction costs to ecosystem fit. Definitely worth calling out when these decisions surprise the community after commitments are already made.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainFries
· 14h ago
It's the same old story... The team didn't clarify at the start which chain they would use, and then suddenly mentioned Solana. I'm really convinced. Choosing the right chain is such a crucial matter, but they act like it's invisible. If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have followed.
View OriginalReply0
NftMetaversePainter
· 14h ago
ngl transparency about chain selection should be table stakes... the fact that teams still pull this move is wild. solana's tradeoffs aren't inherently bad but hiding them until after you're locked in? that's just disrespectful to the community's agency
Reply0
Deconstructionist
· 14h ago
It's the same routine again: upload to the blockchain first, then apologize. We've all been played.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 14h ago
Hey, you're doing the Solana thing again? You should have told me earlier, I've been wasting my time on this for so long.
If the team had been transparent from day one about building on Solana, plenty of us would've made different decisions. The chain choice matters more than most projects want to admit—it affects everything from transaction costs to ecosystem fit. Definitely worth calling out when these decisions surprise the community after commitments are already made.