A-shares surged to 4100 points this week, with a fierce rally. However, I guess many people are now starting to fear missing out. As the old saying goes: the biggest risk in a bull market is not losing money, but missing the opportunity. Once you miss out, your mindset gets distorted, and it becomes easier to make mistakes. Many people's losses come from this.



**So the question is: can 4100 points hold steady?**

The core still depends on liquidity. Since September 24, I have been emphasizing that liquidity is the driving force, and fundamentals are actually less important. Why? Because this round of rise is driven by liquidity; the A-shares market has not yet entered the performance-driven stage. When liquidity is abundant, the stock market can rise to levels that make you doubt your senses—despite poor earnings, why is it still rising? Many people are scared out of the market this way, only to watch the market continue to climb later.

Many are watching whether the central bank will cut RRR or interest rates, but the central bank remains on hold, which frustrates people. Interestingly, the absence of cuts has become a positive signal. Since 2024, I’ve been explaining this logic; many didn’t believe it then, but now they should—though the opportunity to profit has already been missed.

**Is liquidity still ample now? Here are a few reasons why it still is:**

The central bank continues to promote moderate easing, so domestic liquidity is unlikely to face major issues. The Federal Reserve will also keep cutting rates; it’s just a matter of time. More importantly, cross-border capital is rushing back aggressively. Last year’s foreign exchange settlement surplus approached $150 billion, which is about 1 trillion RMB. That’s equivalent to the central bank releasing 1 trillion RMB of liquidity. Do you think that’s how the stock market has risen? Now, with the narrowing of the US-China interest rate differential and Trump starting to break rules to compete for resources, America’s sense of security is declining. These factors will accelerate capital inflows. Additionally, funds from the real estate and bond markets are also moving into stocks.

The CPI and PPI released on Friday both exceeded expectations. Some wonder why they beat expectations, thinking that demand is insufficient for prices to rise. The problem is liquidity flooding the market—of course prices will go up. Don’t wait until the central bank completes its price assessments to jump in; by then, the economy will feel good, but you’ll already be a bagholder.

**Trading volume is a thermometer.** This week, the daily trading volume has already exceeded 30 trillion RMB, indicating new funds are entering the market. A simple formula: stock price = trading volume / ( free float capital × turnover rate ). In the short term, with capital stock unchanged, the stock price is determined by trading volume and turnover rate. As long as the growth rate of trading volume exceeds that of turnover rate, the stock price can continue to rise.

If this wave’s massive volume reaches 35 trillion RMB, the market can continue upward, reaching 4300 points without issue. As the proportion of medium- and long-term funds and index funds increases, the turnover rate growth in A-shares should slow relative to trading volume growth, which is beneficial for subsequent gains.

**The last variable: the willingness of the management.** The stock market’s rise and fall must align with national strategies, not just market trading results. Recently, signs of market control have been evident during trading. We just need to grasp the overall trend; the rest is about managing positions and dancing with volatility. In fact, moving a bit slower can be healthier. As liquidity recovers, the economy and prices will gradually rebound, providing fundamental support for the stock market. Once fundamentals are in place, healthy growth aligned with earnings is sustainable, and there’s no bubble.

Many people have become accustomed to pessimism, even to the point of not believing in economic cycles anymore. That’s a foolish idea. Cycles may be delayed, but they will not be absent. The later they arrive, the greater the rebound potential.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
fren.ethvip
· 11h ago
Liquidity is the real daddy, fundamentals are just floating clouds. Missing out is even more painful than losing money; once your mindset collapses, everything is over. If 4100 can hold steady, the key still depends on whether there is enough money. The PBOC's approach of not lowering reserve requirements is actually quite clever, and it has turned into a positive factor. This wave of gains is so fierce, with a trading volume of 3 trillion yuan, indicating that new money is indeed flowing in. As long as the growth rate of trading volume outpaces turnover rate, there's no problem with stock prices continuing to rise. Speaking of which, there's so much water flowing behind this rally. If we follow his logic, 4300 is not a dream. But it still depends on how the management team wields their swords and guns. Missing out can really drive people crazy; even when they see the right direction, they fail to get on board. This mentality collapses faster than losing money. Delays in the cycle are not a problem; the rebound elasticity is actually greater. There are too many people who have become accustomed to pessimism, and this wave might be their lesson. Once liquidity loosens, even garbage stocks can rise, and this time should be no exception.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkepticvip
· 11h ago
The liquidity story is told quite smoothly, but I feel like it's just missing the line "Are you getting in or not?" The FOMO mentality really hits home; watching others make money can truly drive people crazy. A trading volume of 3.5 trillion directly hitting 4300? That logic sounds comfortable, but I'm just worried it might be another mirage. The central bank not cutting interest rates but instead becoming a positive signal—I'm impressed by this reversal. If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have hesitated. The part about capital returning feels like it’s hitting my core; it seems the national fortune hasn't completely dispersed yet. They talk about controlling the market every day, but why do we still have to bear the risk ourselves? This logic doesn't quite add up. Wait, with liquidity flooding and prices rising, isn't this just setting a trap? What will happen then? Can 4100 hold steady? Asking this question is like asking "What's the weather tomorrow?" I just want to know when it's my turn to take over the position. Please give me a definite timeline.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBrokevip
· 11h ago
Liquidity wave is indeed fierce, but old brother, you're right. Missing out is more torturous than losing money. I'm the kind of person who gets scared out, and now I'm still regretting not buying as the 4100 point level pushes higher. To be honest, I need to ponder the logic that the central bank's refusal to cut interest rates is actually a positive, it feels a bit counterintuitive. Is the capital return really reliable? Can Trump really drive such a large flow of funds? A trading volume of 3.5 trillion to push the index to 4300 points sounds great, but the turnover rate might be underestimated. Predicting management's willingness is the hardest, so retail investors should stay cautious.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivorvip
· 11h ago
It's the same liquidity story, I've been through it all. In 2018, it was told the same way, but what happened... Missing out on gains distorts the mindset, and taking on positions with a worse mindset even more so.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon42vip
· 11h ago
Liquidity is the real boss; the performance metrics can take a backseat for now. Missing out is a hundred times more painful than losing money, and that's no lie. There's a chance for 4300 points; it all depends on whether the trading volume can sustain 3.5 trillion. The central bank's move not to cut rates this time actually turns into a positive signal—ridiculous but true. Funds are shifting from the real estate and bond markets to the stock market—that's a clear sign. Don't wait until your senses feel better to enter the market—that's the last person to take the bait. The cycle is always late but never absent—that's a saying I believe in.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollectorvip
· 12h ago
Liquidity stories are told quite smoothly, but no one knows when the sudden turn will happen, and who will be blamed then. The mindset of missing out is well explained, but there are many people with skewed mindsets who also can't make money. The idea that the central bank not cutting interest rates is actually a positive? That logic confuses me; how can everything rely on rising? Can 4100 hold steady? Honestly, it's still a bet on continuous liquidity, but how long will that last? Will a trading volume of 3 trillion yuan be enough to push the index to 4300? This formula seems to have many issues. The theory of capital returning and catching the falling knives sounds like setting a trap for later entrants. Mindset is the most valuable, but unfortunately, mindset can't be bought with money.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidatedvip
· 12h ago
The talk about liquidity has become tiresome; the real question is when will the fundamentals catch up? It can't always rely on hype. The fear of missing out is the most dangerous thing. Watching others make money is indeed uncomfortable, but I think that's when you're most likely to get cut. If the central bank stays put, is that actually a good thing? Haha, I've never heard that logic before, but it's true that prices are indeed rising now. A trading volume of 3.5 trillion directly pushing to 4300? That sounds too idealistic; reality always gives you a slap. Funds are indeed flowing back, but could it be another trap to lure more investors? Feeling a bit anxious. The saying "delays in the cycle won't mean absence" is spot on; I just don't know if we can survive until that day. The formula for turnover rate and trading volume sounds professional, but in practice, it still depends on the market. Signs of market control? I haven't seen any; maybe my skill level isn't high enough. If prices go up, will the central bank still consider cutting interest rates? It feels a bit contradictory. By the time the fundamentals support the market, it might already be at a high level. That time lag is really a killer.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)