Regarding the Walrus protocol, the most discussed questions online are nothing more than—how is the performance, are the costs expensive, and how long can the data be stored. But actually, these are the wrong questions.
The real misunderstanding lies elsewhere.
Many people habitually place Walrus in the storage track, competing with solutions like Filecoin and Arweave: who is cheaper, faster, more reliable. This comparison framework itself is misguided. Walrus is not competing with these storage protocols at all. Its true opponent is "forgetting."
Have you noticed— in most systems, forgetting is the default option. Old data is constantly overwritten, history is compressed, intermediate states are deleted, and in the end, only a "final result" remains. No problem for small projects, but once on-chain AI, long-term governance frameworks, or complex financial derivatives are involved, this kind of forgetting becomes a pitfall. You have no idea where the current state came from, whether this result is reasonable, or if the history has been altered. In the end, you can only passively accept a black box.
Walrus does the opposite. It says no to default forgetting. In the design philosophy of this protocol, history is not a burden but the most valuable thing in the system.
How does it do this? By using Red Stuff erasure coding combined with Sui's coordination mechanism, Walrus turns blob data into programmable, verifiable native assets. The key is—it preserves the complete evolution path. You can not only see what it looks like now but also trace how it evolved step by step to the present. What is the cost? Short-term efficiency will definitely take a hit. What do you gain? Something extremely valuable—the long-term interpretability and causal traceability. This is crucial for AI data provenance, on-chain auditing, and system evolution over decades.
Fast projects pursue speed and simplicity, but true long-term systems pursue stability and understandability. Walrus is born for the latter.
It doesn't aim to make access faster—it aims to ensure you never lose understanding of the system. Imagine a complex on-chain ecosystem running for ten years, experiencing millions of state changes. What can you still believe in at that point? Results can be easily forged, but the complete process is very hard to fake. Walrus elevates the "process" to a first-class citizen. What it preserves is not just data, but the causal relationships themselves.
It may seem unnecessary now. But when you really want to build a long-term, tamper-proof Web3 system, you'll find—there are actually not many options left.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RebaseVictim
· 01-11 19:51
Finally, someone has clarified this matter. Most people are indeed asking the wrong questions.
History cannot be deleted, I deeply understand this. During the previous rebase, I realized that without complete records, you are at the mercy of others.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreams
· 01-11 19:46
Oh wow, someone finally explained this thoroughly. It's not a storage issue, it's a traceability issue.
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezer
· 01-11 19:40
This guy finally hit the nail on the head; forgetfulness is the real enemy.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollector
· 01-11 19:26
Wow, someone finally broke through this barrier.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMaster
· 01-11 19:23
It sounds like it's about ideological building within the Sui ecosystem... but I have to admit, this perspective is indeed fresh. Compared to those projects that constantly boast "we are ten times cheaper than Filecoin," at least this guy is thinking deeply.
The problem is—how many will truly use on-chain AI and a ten-year evolution framework? Most are still engaged in arbitrage and forking. The three kids I support are more concerning to me daily than the system's reliability. This stuff sounds like it has strong anti-tampering capabilities, but what about the costs? Are the fees transparent? Could it be another case of "long-termism" to cut the leeks?
We need to see how the big shots with white-hat backgrounds audit this contract code; otherwise, just listening to stories... ha.
Regarding the Walrus protocol, the most discussed questions online are nothing more than—how is the performance, are the costs expensive, and how long can the data be stored. But actually, these are the wrong questions.
The real misunderstanding lies elsewhere.
Many people habitually place Walrus in the storage track, competing with solutions like Filecoin and Arweave: who is cheaper, faster, more reliable. This comparison framework itself is misguided. Walrus is not competing with these storage protocols at all. Its true opponent is "forgetting."
Have you noticed— in most systems, forgetting is the default option. Old data is constantly overwritten, history is compressed, intermediate states are deleted, and in the end, only a "final result" remains. No problem for small projects, but once on-chain AI, long-term governance frameworks, or complex financial derivatives are involved, this kind of forgetting becomes a pitfall. You have no idea where the current state came from, whether this result is reasonable, or if the history has been altered. In the end, you can only passively accept a black box.
Walrus does the opposite. It says no to default forgetting. In the design philosophy of this protocol, history is not a burden but the most valuable thing in the system.
How does it do this? By using Red Stuff erasure coding combined with Sui's coordination mechanism, Walrus turns blob data into programmable, verifiable native assets. The key is—it preserves the complete evolution path. You can not only see what it looks like now but also trace how it evolved step by step to the present. What is the cost? Short-term efficiency will definitely take a hit. What do you gain? Something extremely valuable—the long-term interpretability and causal traceability. This is crucial for AI data provenance, on-chain auditing, and system evolution over decades.
Fast projects pursue speed and simplicity, but true long-term systems pursue stability and understandability. Walrus is born for the latter.
It doesn't aim to make access faster—it aims to ensure you never lose understanding of the system. Imagine a complex on-chain ecosystem running for ten years, experiencing millions of state changes. What can you still believe in at that point? Results can be easily forged, but the complete process is very hard to fake. Walrus elevates the "process" to a first-class citizen. What it preserves is not just data, but the causal relationships themselves.
It may seem unnecessary now. But when you really want to build a long-term, tamper-proof Web3 system, you'll find—there are actually not many options left.