2026-01-11 19:20:52

Imagine that your property deeds, stock holdings, and even art shares can be transferred on the chain—enabling free trading without worrying about compliance and privacy issues. How big is this market? The answer is: ridiculously large.

And Dusk is turning this idea from a fantasy into code. As a Layer 1 public chain focused on financial infrastructure, it provides a modular architecture that creates a stage for such applications. Unlike projects that mainly use privacy technology for payments, Dusk makes privacy a core capability of smart contracts and DApps—meaning developers can run complex DeFi applications directly on it, with privacy protection and compliance requirements both met.

Sounds conceptual, right? But from another perspective, when a large number of real-world assets are tokenized, what is blockchain really? It’s not just about trading tokens, but about genuine financial infrastructure. Dusk has chosen a differentiated path, finding its own position in the homogeneous public chain race. For those optimistic about large-scale Web3 commercial applications, this project is worth watching—it can tell us how blockchain can truly serve the real economy.

DUSK-9,39%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainFortuneTeller

· 10h ago

Privacy + compliance combo really makes for an interesting punch, but it has to be truly implemented to count.

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer

· 01-11 19:48

Amazing, the idea of truly putting assets on the chain is bound to happen sooner or later. Dusk's approach is indeed unique. Wait, how can privacy compliance really be satisfied at the same time? That's a bit questionable. This is what it means to do real work with blockchain, not just another new coin to harvest retail investors. I believe in putting property ownership certificates on the chain; art shares? That depends on how regulators handle it. Feels like just a pie in the sky. Let's wait until big institutions actually come in before making any conclusions. There are too many Layer 1 public chains; how long their differentiation can last is still unknown.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 01-11 19:46

Are real estate, stocks, and artworks all on the blockchain? That sounds more ambitious than ETFs. However, Dusk's combination of privacy and compliance is indeed interesting, and it's definitely more reliable than those projects that only talk big but do nothing.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-11 19:45

According to on-chain data tracking, the fund flow of these RWA projects has always been quite interesting... The combination of privacy + compliance clearly aims to serve as a cover for large asset transfers.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter

· 01-11 19:43

Putting real assets on the blockchain is indeed the right direction, but the key is whether it can actually be implemented. Otherwise, it will just be another round of PPT fundraising.

View OriginalReply0

TokenUnlocker

· 01-11 19:23

The idea of putting real estate on the blockchain has been talked about for years, but few have actually made it happen... Dusk's approach is indeed different, combining privacy + compliance at the same time, it doesn't sound so magical anymore.

View OriginalReply0