Many people hold Bitcoin but only have a vague understanding of address formats. In fact, there are four types of BTC addresses, each with its own characteristics. Understanding them can save on fees and avoid many troubles.



Let's start with the oldest one: addresses beginning with 1 are first-generation, and their transaction fees are quite high. Nowadays, hardly anyone uses them. Addresses starting with 3 are transitional products, considered legacy, and are not recommended.

The truly noteworthy one is the bc1q prefix, which is currently the best choice—saving on fees and preventing address input errors. The latest bc1p technology is the most advanced, but some exchanges do not support it yet, so its adoption rate is not high.

At this point, many people will ask: how about security? Here's an important point: address format has little to do with security. What truly determines security is your private key management, whether you use a cold wallet, and if you have multi-signature protections.

In summary: when creating a new Bitcoin address, just choose bc1q. Don't overcomplicate it; all BTC addresses can transfer to each other. If issues arise, they usually stem from exchange risk control or insufficient personal knowledge—Bitcoin itself is not the problem.
BTC-0,25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SurvivorshipBiasvip
· 5h ago
I'll just use bc1q, it's more convenient.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuruvip
· 18h ago
Damn, finally someone explained it clearly. I’ve been using addresses starting with 1 all along. No wonder I keep getting burned badly every time I try to sell coins. Just send to bc1q, got it. Remembered. --- Private key security is the key. Address formats are all fake. Nothing wrong with that point. --- bc1p exchanges are really slow to support. When will they become widespread? --- I was once caught in exchange risk control. Now I realize it’s really my own fault. No wonder others get caught too. --- So in the end, you still have to put in the effort to learn. Don’t just lie around waiting for your coins to appreciate.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdropvip
· 01-11 18:53
bc1q is really amazing. I used to use addresses starting with 1, but the fees were ridiculously high.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairyvip
· 01-11 18:53
ngl the address format thing is lowkey a market inefficiency that gets exploited... bc1q being cheaper just means less MEV leakage on chain, statistically speaking
Reply0
Lonely_Validatorvip
· 01-11 18:52
bc1q is really amazing, it was about time to use this to save on fees
View OriginalReply0
DYORMastervip
· 01-11 18:40
bc1q, get started, stop being exploited by exchanges for high fees
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinionvip
· 01-11 18:39
bc1q is really the best—saves on fees and remains stable. I switched long ago.
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectualvip
· 01-11 18:38
I've been using bc1q for a year, and it really saved me a lot of gas. I deleted the one that starts with 1 a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)