The world of digital finance is always playing a dangerous balancing game: wanting transparency while maintaining privacy; needing efficiency but also security. This contradiction is most evident in the institutional investment sector—investment funds crave the efficiency of blockchain for clearing and settlement, but absolutely cannot let their trading strategies and position information be exposed on-chain; regulators require all transactions to be traceable and auditable, while investors are desperately protecting their financial privacy. It sounds like a deadlock, but some in the tech community are already trying to break it. The core idea is to use cryptographic black technologies like zero-knowledge proofs to build a "confidential smart contract" framework. What’s the brilliance of this framework? Data remains encrypted at all times, yet you can still process and verify it. For example: a multi-party securities transaction is completed on-chain, with the specific terms kept confidential from outsiders and competitors, but a cryptographic proof is sent in real-time to regulators, demonstrating that the transaction fully complies with anti-money laundering regulations and securities laws. This effectively protects privacy while meeting compliance requirements—sounds a bit magical, doesn’t it? This new mode of "auditable privacy" is like opening a new meridian for the asset tokenization field, which has long been hindered by privacy and compliance issues. Traditional large assets like real estate, private equity, and bonds finally have the opportunity to truly enjoy the convenience brought by blockchain, while safeguarding trade secrets and investor privacy. This shows that privacy and compliance are not mutually exclusive choices, but can be achieved together through technological innovation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryingOldWallet
· 9h ago
Are zero-knowledge proofs really reliable? I think it still depends on the actual implementation and results.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLady
· 01-11 18:50
ngl this is exactly the kind of elegant solution we've been waiting for... zero-knowledge proofs finally making compliance not suck? that's genuinely bullish for institutional adoption tbh
Reply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 01-11 18:46
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but there are only a few projects that can truly be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperer
· 01-11 18:41
Zero-knowledge proofs sound great in theory, but how many projects can actually be implemented? It feels like just another big pie-in-the-sky plan.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMiner
· 01-11 18:32
Zero-knowledge proofs sound high-end, but can they really be implemented? It seems like those institutional folks will still find all kinds of reasons to delay.
View OriginalReply0
FundingMartyr
· 01-11 18:23
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but can they really be implemented in practice? Or is it just another hype concept?
The world of digital finance is always playing a dangerous balancing game: wanting transparency while maintaining privacy; needing efficiency but also security. This contradiction is most evident in the institutional investment sector—investment funds crave the efficiency of blockchain for clearing and settlement, but absolutely cannot let their trading strategies and position information be exposed on-chain; regulators require all transactions to be traceable and auditable, while investors are desperately protecting their financial privacy. It sounds like a deadlock, but some in the tech community are already trying to break it. The core idea is to use cryptographic black technologies like zero-knowledge proofs to build a "confidential smart contract" framework. What’s the brilliance of this framework? Data remains encrypted at all times, yet you can still process and verify it. For example: a multi-party securities transaction is completed on-chain, with the specific terms kept confidential from outsiders and competitors, but a cryptographic proof is sent in real-time to regulators, demonstrating that the transaction fully complies with anti-money laundering regulations and securities laws. This effectively protects privacy while meeting compliance requirements—sounds a bit magical, doesn’t it? This new mode of "auditable privacy" is like opening a new meridian for the asset tokenization field, which has long been hindered by privacy and compliance issues. Traditional large assets like real estate, private equity, and bonds finally have the opportunity to truly enjoy the convenience brought by blockchain, while safeguarding trade secrets and investor privacy. This shows that privacy and compliance are not mutually exclusive choices, but can be achieved together through technological innovation.