2026-01-11 18:21:14

In the撸毛 project, relying solely on basic tasks on a single chain to get welfare is not enough; if you want to double your earnings, you need to play some tricks. As Walrus enters its final stage, the importance of cross-chain interaction and the weight mechanism are rising, which is the window of opportunity for advanced participants.

The core logic is actually not complicated. First, complete basic tasks with the Sui wallet as proof of entry, then use cross-chain bridges to transfer assets to the Ethereum or Solana ecosystems. There, participate in high-interaction activities like DeFi trading and NFT minting. Finally, migrate data or assets back to Walrus to form a complete closed loop. Doing so can directly earn a 25% weight bonus. Each additional cross-chain interaction record on a public chain can increase the weight by another 10%, and the cumulative effect is quite significant.

Operational details require strategic planning. Avoid frequent transfers; 1-2 cross-chain operations per week are sufficient. Too frequent transfers may trigger risk control systems. Choose cross-chain bridge protocols with large TVL for better stability, and prioritize using stablecoins during interactions to avoid price volatility interference. During the final stage, the weight tilt towards multi-chain interactions is very obvious. Those who master this rhythm can often outpace many follow-the-leader players, making five-figure airdrop returns almost a dream.

WAL0,19%

SUI1,6%

ETH6,06%

SOL2,88%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DataOnlooker

· 48m ago

So it's really cross-chain nesting, huh? Doing it twice a week just to avoid being caught by risk control. Bro, you're playing this rhythm quite meticulously.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 3h ago

The core mechanism is essentially an incentive compatibility issue— the more obvious the weight bias, the easier it is to expose risk control vulnerabilities. Setting the frequency to 1-2 times a week is quite interesting, indicating that the officials have a clear understanding. However, on the other hand, this cross-chain closed-loop design indeed exposes the flaws in the proposal process— why does the weight bias only become so apparent during the final phase? Rules should be transparent from the first stage, rather than leaving such a large arbitrage window for the smart people. Wait, a five-figure airdrop... how is this number calculated?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeAssassin

· 01-12 06:56

Once or twice a week at this frequency is really too much, not because of being scared by risk control, but mainly because the gas fee number can really discourage people.

View OriginalReply0

LayerHopper

· 01-11 18:51

Wait a minute, does crossing chains 1-2 times a week really not get caught by risk control? When I was messing around with Arbitrum before, I felt that even with lower frequency, I was flagged. Is it really about the specific project's risk control threshold?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXiao

· 01-11 18:50

Wow, this cross-chain weighted playstyle is really intense. Starting from 25% and stacking more, no wonder this round of earning can reach five figures.

View OriginalReply0

SleepyValidator

· 01-11 18:50

Damn, I need to remember this pace of cross-chain 1-2 times a week, don't get killed by risk control.

View OriginalReply0

blockBoy

· 01-11 18:50

Hmm, I have a bit of a feeling of a comeback with this set of logic. Cross-chain weight support can indeed create differences, but the risk control aspect really needs to be handled carefully.

View OriginalReply0

StableGeniusDegen

· 01-11 18:32

Five-digit airdrop sounds easy... I just want to know how many people actually received that money.

View OriginalReply0