Have ICOs become a thing of the past? The answer might be more nuanced than you'd think. The real issue is that most projects are approaching tokenomics all wrong—raising capital excessively and crushing price discovery mechanisms before token generation events even happen. What gets mistaken for genuine user demand is really just pre-token speculation hype.
There's a different playbook though. Look at Cypher: the team prioritized actual user adoption and executed a fair launch strategy. That's where the real bullish signal lives. Similarly, EIP7503 is taking the same user-first approach, and it's refreshing to see projects that put community value above quick fundraising.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrier
· 1h ago
Fair launch is the true way, those funding maniacs should have gone bankrupt long ago.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeOnChain
· 2h ago
Fair launch is the way to go, those overfunded projects should have died long ago.
View OriginalReply0
DegenTherapist
· 14h ago
Fair launch is definitely the way out; it's much more reliable than those projects that are wildly raising funds.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuth
· 14h ago
ICO should have died long ago. The way those project teams raise funds is truly impressive. The pre-token hype really has demand; I just smile.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 14h ago
According to research, ICOs are not dead; rather, most projects have been ruined—fundraising was too aggressive, and the price discovery mechanism was destroyed. That’s the real issue.
Just looking at the two projects, Cypher and EIP7503, the technical differences are clear: one focuses on user growth, the other on fair launch. That’s true skill. It’s worth noting that everyone has mistaken speculative enthusiasm for genuine demand, but data shows that most of it is just pre-token hype.
In summary, the key isn’t whether ICOs are dead or alive, but which path the project teams choose.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugs
· 14h ago
Alright, to be honest, ICOs should have died long ago. They're just a bunch of projects scamming investors. Tokenomics are completely reversed, fundraising is ridiculously high, whitepapers are beautifully written but all empty talk in practice...
I've looked into Cypher's fair launch, and it's okay, at least it's not the kind of crazy pre-sale. Compared to most projects, it's at least more sincere.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 15h ago
Fair launch is the true value, those projects that are wildly funded should have failed long ago.
Have ICOs become a thing of the past? The answer might be more nuanced than you'd think. The real issue is that most projects are approaching tokenomics all wrong—raising capital excessively and crushing price discovery mechanisms before token generation events even happen. What gets mistaken for genuine user demand is really just pre-token speculation hype.
There's a different playbook though. Look at Cypher: the team prioritized actual user adoption and executed a fair launch strategy. That's where the real bullish signal lives. Similarly, EIP7503 is taking the same user-first approach, and it's refreshing to see projects that put community value above quick fundraising.