A significant concentration pattern emerged in the NBS (Nimbus) project, where insiders accumulated 94% of tokens into just 2 wallets on the Ethereum chain. This heavy insider concentration raises questions about token distribution and early holder dynamics. The level of consolidation suggests limited initial circulation among core stakeholders, which is worth monitoring for potential liquidity and price impact implications.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProtocolRebel
· 14h ago
94% dumped into two wallets? That shows a huge lack of trust in liquidity.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetScholar
· 14h ago
Another insider-controlled project, with 94% in 2 wallets? How shady is that?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapist
· 14h ago
94% two wallets? How does this work? It's the early stage where the team directly cuts the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHopper
· 14h ago
94% two wallets? Isn't this just a blatant rug prelude lol
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClick
· 14h ago
94% concentrated in 2 wallets? Isn't this just obvious money grabbing?
A significant concentration pattern emerged in the NBS (Nimbus) project, where insiders accumulated 94% of tokens into just 2 wallets on the Ethereum chain. This heavy insider concentration raises questions about token distribution and early holder dynamics. The level of consolidation suggests limited initial circulation among core stakeholders, which is worth monitoring for potential liquidity and price impact implications.