2026-01-11 17:30:22

Persisting in doing what you love is itself a form of wisdom.

When we talk about technology directions like AI robots and stablecoins, the core logic is actually the same—finding the right thing to do, then doing it well. As fundamental infrastructure in the crypto market, stablecoins play an increasingly important role in the DeFi ecosystem, and this direction itself is sound. The application potential of AI in Web3 continues to unfold.

But the key question is: once we confirm these directions are correct, how do we execute next to do things right? This requires deep reflection on products, user experience, and real-world application scenarios. Not every promising track can succeed; execution capability and attention to detail are ultimately the determining factors.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ETHReserveBank

· 12h ago

That's right, the right direction is key to execution. Half of the stablecoin projects in DeFi fail due to details. That's why I favor teams that truly prioritize user experience. There are too many boastful teams in Web3; only the tough ones survive. Execution capability is truly the ceiling; there's no room for debate.

View OriginalReply0

faded_wojak.eth

· 12h ago

There's nothing wrong with what you said, but the execution part is really hellishly difficult.

View OriginalReply0

DefiOldTrickster

· 13h ago

Haha, nice words, but let me tell you, over the past ten years I've seen how much "passion" on the chain has ended up being "cutting leeks"... Execution? Details? Brother, you're right, but when it comes to bear market liquidation prices, how many USDC is your passion really worth?

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 13h ago

nah, everyone's suddenly an "execution expert" now... but lemme check the actual transaction patterns before buying this narrative, honestly. most of these projects got the vision thing down, data suggests it's the ops that implodes 80% of the time.

Reply0

AltcoinHunter

· 13h ago

It sounds good, but in reality, 95% of projects are just talk and no action, with terrible execution. Wait, can stablecoins and AI really be equated? One is infrastructure, the other is an application direction. How can their core logic be the same? That's a bit wishful thinking. Regarding attention to detail... I just want to ask, how many teams truly care about user experience? Most are just rushing to raise funds and then run away.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 13h ago

That's what they say, but there are very few projects that can truly pay attention to the details. Execution is easy to talk about but extremely difficult to do. The stablecoin track has long been competitive to the point of exhaustion, still competing over who can be more ruthless in execution. In Web3, there are many people passionate about a particular direction, but how many projects can survive beyond the second year? Ideas are never in short supply; what’s truly lacking are the people who can turn them into reality.

View OriginalReply0

PositionPhobia

· 13h ago

Honestly, even if the direction is right, it's useless if execution is poor and full of pitfalls. Talk is cheap; the real proof is in the details. Stablecoins and AI sound appealing, but only a few can truly survive. Execution capability is the real competitive edge. It's also about "finding the right thing"; the key is whether you can do it right. That's the hard part. I agree. No matter how good the track is, it all depends on who can endure the cold winter.

View OriginalReply0