2026-01-11 16:31:28

Ever wonder why someone might allocate just 20% to ETH while favoring XMR and Gold at 25%? Here's what's really happening:

On Ethereum, wrapped BTC and Gold serve as yield-bearing collateral. Layer in native stablecoins like $BOLD, and suddenly your exposure mechanics shift dramatically. The math becomes clearer when you realize 75% of the entire position actually settles within the Ethereum ecosystem through these tokenized assets.

Meanwhile, the remaining 25% lives on Monero—completely separate infrastructure, different risk profile.

It's not about the percentages you see on the surface; it's about understanding where your capital actually operates. DeFi strategy isn't just allocation—it's architecture.

ETH-0,15%

BTC0,52%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenGambler

· 01-11 16:53

Damn, this is the real on-chain architecture. Surface-level configurations can't fool me.

View OriginalReply0

MoodFollowsPrice

· 01-11 16:43

Wow, 75% settled within the Ethereum ecosystem? That's the real focus.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyLemur

· 01-11 16:41

Wow, this is true on-chain architecture.

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 01-11 16:40

I hadn't thought of this nested doll approach before; 75% circulating on-chain truly is an invisible leverage.

View OriginalReply0

AirDropMissed

· 01-11 16:37

Bro, isn't this just playing a shell game in the Ethereum ecosystem? On the surface, 20% ETH seems like a lot, but secretly, 75% is actually running around inside... Clever, but I still trust that 25% of XMR more; at least I don't have to guess riddles.

View OriginalReply0