Regulatory policy changes often reshape the market landscape. If centralized exchanges face new policy and environmental requirements, the perpetual DEX track may present development opportunities, and related tokens like $LIT are expected to attract market attention.
However, in the long term, predicting the market is a more worthwhile focus. These platforms gather user intelligence through incentive mechanisms, forming an efficient information pricing mechanism, and have relatively greater ecological potential. Market restructuring under policy shocks often opens up growth space for emerging tracks — this is also a key window for prediction markets to gradually emerge.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashBard
· 10h ago
ngl the prediction market thesis hits different when you frame it as market darwinism through policy shock... but tbh $LIT pump feels like narrative whiplash waiting to happen
Reply0
GasGuru
· 15h ago
Perpetual DEX short-term profits, but prediction markets are the real intelligence game.
---
$LIT is bouncing? When regulation cuts this line, everyone will have to run.
---
I agree with the statement that the depth of the prediction market ecosystem is important, but it's still too early to enter now.
---
Another rotation, CeFi gets hammered and DEX takes off. This script is the same every time.
---
The information pricing mechanism sounds good, but what about liquidity?
---
Policy shocks = new opportunities. The logic is sound, but the question is, can you buy the dip?
---
Prediction markets are indeed underestimated, just because user education costs are too high.
---
$LIT, for now, let's wait and see. I'm still waiting for major prediction market projects.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivor
· 19h ago
DEX this wave does have some substance, but prediction markets are the real potential stocks.
Perpetual trading is the old routine; only by playing prediction markets can you seize true bottom-fishing opportunities.
Regulation coming, but is it actually a positive? I find it a bit hard to understand.
Can $LIT rise? It still seems to depend on the performance of prediction markets.
When policies change, chaos ensues. Is a new track about to take off? Hold on, I’ll wait and see.
Prediction markets are a good idea, but I’m worried it will turn into a mess again later.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 01-11 16:59
Perpetual DEX sounds good, but prediction markets are the real game of wisdom.
---
Whenever regulations come, someone gets "harvested." Who will it be this time?
---
$LIT? Still optimistic about the long-term potential of prediction markets; short-term speculation is too虚.
---
Speaking of which, the information pricing in prediction markets is indeed much more transparent than centralized exchanges.
---
When policy windows open, people flock in. It's safer to observe and wait for changes.
---
The depth of the prediction market ecosystem is indeed underestimated; liquidity remains a problem.
---
Perpetual DEX won't be hot for long; history tells us new tracks are always like this.
---
How long this policy dividend can last, I have no idea.
---
The information pricing mechanism sounds high-end, but how many people truly understand it in practice?
---
Long-term, I support prediction markets; short-term, playing with DEXs. I accept this logic.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 01-11 16:58
The prediction market sector has really been seriously underestimated. When regulation hits, CEXs panic, but DEXs actually have a chance. However, in the long run, it still depends on whether the prediction track can survive the next bear market.
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 01-11 16:52
Perpetual DEX can't take off; prediction markets are the real future.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssues
· 01-11 16:39
Whenever regulation comes, various tracks are repeatedly hyped. To put it nicely, it's an opportunity; to be blunt, it's a signal of harvesting retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 01-11 16:31
Perpetual DEXs are okay, but I think prediction markets are the real gold mine.
---
$LIT can it rise this wave? Feels like another pump and dump.
---
Prediction markets indeed have clear logic, but how many can actually be implemented?
---
Whenever regulation comes, they just shift the blame to DEXs, hilarious.
---
Wait, can prediction markets really form a pricing mechanism? Sounds a bit uncertain.
---
The risks of perpetual DEXs are too high; I still believe in the development potential of prediction markets.
---
The policy window is so short; who can hold on till the end?
---
No, why is it always DEXs and prediction markets choosing one? Both are important.
---
If LIT can break through the previous high, then I might believe it. Anything else is just talk.
---
Gathering user wisdom in prediction markets? Sounds too utopian.
Regulatory policy changes often reshape the market landscape. If centralized exchanges face new policy and environmental requirements, the perpetual DEX track may present development opportunities, and related tokens like $LIT are expected to attract market attention.
However, in the long term, predicting the market is a more worthwhile focus. These platforms gather user intelligence through incentive mechanisms, forming an efficient information pricing mechanism, and have relatively greater ecological potential. Market restructuring under policy shocks often opens up growth space for emerging tracks — this is also a key window for prediction markets to gradually emerge.