When it comes to storage protocols like Walrus, staying only at the technical concept level can feel somewhat detached. Let's approach it from a more solid perspective: suppose you are a developer in the Sui ecosystem, and you have an upcoming blockchain game. How do you store thousands of 3D models and high-resolution textures?
Traditional cloud service bills can be painfully high. Switching to decentralized storage raises concerns about whether IOPS (read/write operations per second) and network latency will ruin user experience. This dilemma is exactly what Walrus aims to break.
It doesn't boast about being a "cloud service replacement." Instead, it positions itself as a pragmatic solution focused on high-performance blockchain storage needs—those "small but substantial" storage demands. Its core technology is erasure coding, which sounds complex but is essentially a "cost-optimized storage management" approach: slicing and encoding data using mathematical methods, trading off a much lower redundancy compared to simple replication while maintaining the same level of availability and security.
According to industry technical evaluations, this method can offer cost advantages in handling unstructured data like images and videos that surpass the 75% figure often promoted by official sources. In other words, a content platform with 100,000 daily active users might save tens of thousands of dollars per month on storage alone, sometimes even hundreds of thousands—savings that directly boost profits and extend the startup runway.
What's more interesting is its synergy with Sui. Storage operations can be deeply integrated with Move smart contracts, making data access feel as smooth as calling local functions. This addresses a long-standing issue in decentralized storage: the disconnect caused by separating storage and computation. Some projects involved in AIGC content generation or blockchain game asset management are already experimenting with integration, and their real-world feedback is quite worth paying attention to.
To truly evaluate Walrus's value, instead of fixating on token price movements, it’s better to see whether it can become the "default storage solution" for Sui developers. When convenience, cost-effectiveness, and usability are all simultaneously met, the ecosystem's direction tends to develop naturally.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArchaeologis
· 11h ago
Tsk, finally someone explains storage in a way that makes sense. It's not just hype; it really hits the pain points of developers.
View OriginalReply0
EternalMiner
· 17h ago
Honestly, I don't hype or criticize—Walrus's erasure coding really hits the pain points of developers.
I believe in saving money and effort, but the key is whether the ecosystem truly follows up.
The most concerning thing now is that good technology could become just a PPT project. Let's wait and see in a few months.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 01-11 16:55
Another "money-saving plan" story, and I'm tired of hearing it. The storage projects from 2018 are pretty much the same as what we're talking about now. And in the end? They all died.
But Walrus this time is indeed a bit different—at least it’s not spouting nonsense about disrupting cloud services. It’s just focusing on developers’ wallets. The money saved on data can directly increase profits, which is a real need, not just empty talk.
I’m just worried it will turn into the usual pattern: initial attractive discounts to attract users, then once the ecosystem is built and the token skyrockets, developers find that their costs are actually higher. I’ve seen this play out too many times.
View OriginalReply0
tx_pending_forever
· 01-11 16:55
Erasure coding sounds impressive, but it's really just a fancy way to save money. I respect that.
That's right, blockchain game developers are really getting squeezed by cloud service providers now. If it were up to me, I’d really consider this thing carefully.
The key is how well it integrates with Sui. If it can be as smooth as tuning local functions, it would definitely be convincing.
Hundreds of thousands in monthly savings? Well, I need to see real project feedback before I believe that, otherwise it's just promotional talk...
Default solutions are the way to go. Token price trends are all fake; ecosystem retention is the real gold and silver.
View OriginalReply0
HashBandit
· 01-11 16:50
ngl the erasure coding thing actually hits different than your typical bullshit storage pitch... finally someone focusing on real unit economics instead of "web3 will replace everything" cope
Reply0
LightningAllInHero
· 01-11 16:39
Now we're finally getting to the point—cloud service bills can really drive people crazy.
Saving hundreds of thousands is a bit hard for me to handle; it depends on the actual scale of the project.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-11 16:34
Basically, it's a handy tool in the Sui ecosystem, saving money is the main goal.
Has it truly been implemented? Just listening to the project team hype.
This erasure coding sounds impressive, but can it actually run stably?
Saving money is good, but what if the chain crashes one day and the data is lost?
It's quite interesting, much more reliable than those storage solutions that just keep shouting slogans.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 01-11 16:28
This Walrus is indeed interesting, but how many truly sustainable decentralized storage solutions are there? The key still depends on whether the ecosystem accepts it or not.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 01-11 16:27
Saving money really hits the pain point, the cloud service bills are just outrageous.
But can Walrus really be stable enough to let developers use it with confidence? That's the key.
When it comes to storage protocols like Walrus, staying only at the technical concept level can feel somewhat detached. Let's approach it from a more solid perspective: suppose you are a developer in the Sui ecosystem, and you have an upcoming blockchain game. How do you store thousands of 3D models and high-resolution textures?
Traditional cloud service bills can be painfully high. Switching to decentralized storage raises concerns about whether IOPS (read/write operations per second) and network latency will ruin user experience. This dilemma is exactly what Walrus aims to break.
It doesn't boast about being a "cloud service replacement." Instead, it positions itself as a pragmatic solution focused on high-performance blockchain storage needs—those "small but substantial" storage demands. Its core technology is erasure coding, which sounds complex but is essentially a "cost-optimized storage management" approach: slicing and encoding data using mathematical methods, trading off a much lower redundancy compared to simple replication while maintaining the same level of availability and security.
According to industry technical evaluations, this method can offer cost advantages in handling unstructured data like images and videos that surpass the 75% figure often promoted by official sources. In other words, a content platform with 100,000 daily active users might save tens of thousands of dollars per month on storage alone, sometimes even hundreds of thousands—savings that directly boost profits and extend the startup runway.
What's more interesting is its synergy with Sui. Storage operations can be deeply integrated with Move smart contracts, making data access feel as smooth as calling local functions. This addresses a long-standing issue in decentralized storage: the disconnect caused by separating storage and computation. Some projects involved in AIGC content generation or blockchain game asset management are already experimenting with integration, and their real-world feedback is quite worth paying attention to.
To truly evaluate Walrus's value, instead of fixating on token price movements, it’s better to see whether it can become the "default storage solution" for Sui developers. When convenience, cost-effectiveness, and usability are all simultaneously met, the ecosystem's direction tends to develop naturally.