One of the bottlenecks for large-scale Web3 adoption lies in the data layer. High performance, low cost, and verifiability—these three seemingly simple requirements have stumped many solutions. Until recently, the combination of deep integration with the Sui blockchain and the emergence of Red-Stuff erasure coding technology finally provided a respectable answer to this longstanding problem.
Just looking at the cost comparison reveals how significant the difference is. How much does it cost to store 1TB of data for a year with traditional solutions? Filecoin requires 25x redundancy, Arweave even up to 1000x, which translates to hundreds of dollars. The new solution only needs 4-5x storage overhead to ensure high availability, bringing annual costs down to around $50. A hundredfold difference—this is not just optimization; it’s a paradigm upgrade.
Even more impressive is the subsequent design. Each stored file on the chain is mapped as a programmable object, transforming data from static files into dynamic assets that can be managed, verified, and transferred via smart contracts. This addresses a long-standing pain point in the NFT and gaming asset fields—separation of data and assets. Now, they can truly be integrated.
This verifiable storage approach opens doors to several cutting-edge directions. Fully on-chain gaming is no longer a pipe dream—game assets, states, and content are stored entirely on decentralized networks, while maintaining verifiability. Players can genuinely own their assets, making ownership no longer just a slogan.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_aped.eth
· 01-11 15:43
A hundredfold cost difference is directly cut, this is truly revolutionary. Filecoin and Arweave are getting nervous.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 01-11 15:36
Damn, is this cost a hundred times higher? Filecoin and Arweave are being rubbed on the ground and scraped.
Really? Can Sui rely on Red-Stuff encoding technology to overthrow traditional storage? That's pretty impressive.
Stop talking nonsense about on-chain games. Is there really a chance this time?
$50 a year to store 1TB—something feels off... Can data reliability really be guaranteed?
NFT assets can finally live on the chain without being controlled by custodians anymore. Awesome.
It seems this wave will establish Sui, while other public chains are still dreaming.
Both Sui and new encoding methods—why does it feel like the stories in the ecosystem are getting more and more intense?
The concept of programmable objects is indeed wild, but is it really that smooth to implement?
Using data for asset circulation—game industry will definitely jump on this.
Who is actually using this stuff? Or is it still in the PPT stage?
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 01-11 15:34
A hundredfold cost gap, this time it's really not an exaggeration... finally someone has crossed the hurdle of the data layer
View OriginalReply0
TokenAlchemist
· 01-11 15:31
ngl the 4-5x redundancy erasure coding angle actually closes a real inefficiency vector here... but let's be real, arweave's 1000x comparison is lowkey cherry picking their worst case scenario lmao
Reply0
JustHereForMemes
· 01-11 15:24
Bro, Filecoin 1000x redundancy? Isn't that just paying an IQ tax haha
Arweave isn't even this outrageous
If Sui's system can really stay stable, the blockchain gaming industry should really take off
NFT data can finally sustain itself
No more relying on custodians
By the way, how does Red-Stuff ensure this technology won't fail?
$50 a year for 1TB storage?
That's a pretty scary cost
What do the folks at Filecoin think?
I bet five cents this is just another marketing stunt
But if on-chain games can really run stably, I’ll believe it
After all, how many times have they hyped it up in the past few years?
Is this really the real deal or just another hype cycle?
Let's see how it goes
One of the bottlenecks for large-scale Web3 adoption lies in the data layer. High performance, low cost, and verifiability—these three seemingly simple requirements have stumped many solutions. Until recently, the combination of deep integration with the Sui blockchain and the emergence of Red-Stuff erasure coding technology finally provided a respectable answer to this longstanding problem.
Just looking at the cost comparison reveals how significant the difference is. How much does it cost to store 1TB of data for a year with traditional solutions? Filecoin requires 25x redundancy, Arweave even up to 1000x, which translates to hundreds of dollars. The new solution only needs 4-5x storage overhead to ensure high availability, bringing annual costs down to around $50. A hundredfold difference—this is not just optimization; it’s a paradigm upgrade.
Even more impressive is the subsequent design. Each stored file on the chain is mapped as a programmable object, transforming data from static files into dynamic assets that can be managed, verified, and transferred via smart contracts. This addresses a long-standing pain point in the NFT and gaming asset fields—separation of data and assets. Now, they can truly be integrated.
This verifiable storage approach opens doors to several cutting-edge directions. Fully on-chain gaming is no longer a pipe dream—game assets, states, and content are stored entirely on decentralized networks, while maintaining verifiability. Players can genuinely own their assets, making ownership no longer just a slogan.