2026-01-11 14:32:01

WXT token catching attention lately. Plenty of traders are betting it'll break previous highs sometime next year, given current price levels seem relatively accessible. The accumulation thesis hinges on whether the project can deliver on its roadmap. Real question is whether the current valuation provides enough margin of safety for the risk involved. Worth watching the on-chain metrics and development updates closely in coming quarters.

WXT0,45%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MidnightMEVeater

· 01-11 18:58

Good morning, 2:00 AM. WXT this crappy thing is a textbook example of a liquidity trap. Now entering is just feeding cannon fodder for next year's sandwich attack.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-11 15:01

Those who are optimistic about WXT should ask themselves: how high can this bull market go? Is the roadmap really reliable?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSobber

· 01-11 15:00

Whether the roadmap can be delivered on time is the key; currently, buying is all about betting on the management's execution capability.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHermit

· 01-11 14:55

Those who are optimistic about WXT have a gambling mindset. A low price doesn't necessarily mean there's enough margin of safety... it depends on whether the team can truly deliver.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterX

· 01-11 14:54

Can WXT break above the previous high this time? It seems like the current price is still a good entry point, but I'm worried it might just be another false start.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSpy

· 01-11 14:38

Roadmaps... often look great on paper, but how many can actually be implemented? WXT's current price indeed looks comfortable, but following the trend too much isn't necessarily a good thing.

View OriginalReply0