The true essence of ownership economy is not about building isolated islands.
A new logic of collaboration is emerging — every contribution you make is directly embedded into the protocol itself, rather than being swallowed up by a central authority.
How does it work specifically?
🧬 **Contribution equals rights confirmation**. Verified contributions automatically confirm rights, no approval needed, no waiting, and they take effect in real-time.
🤖 **Dynamic power distribution**. Fractal governance mechanisms allow voting power to flow naturally with contributions. More contributions = greater say, with transparent and traceable rules.
🚀 **Temporary autonomous organizations**. Imagine future teams like this: you, an AI agent, and community contributors form a temporary team to complete a task. Once the task is done, the organization dissolves automatically, and assets are settled immediately, with no redundant steps.
This is not about building a walled garden — setting strict limits on who can enter and who cannot. We aim to cultivate a rainforest system, where each species can find its ecological niche, resulting in strong vitality and resilience.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 01-11 14:58
It sounds quite idealistic, but when it comes to actual implementation, won't the power distribution still be manipulated by the big players...
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-11 14:57
Wow, this is true decentralization. Finally, someone got it right.
Those previous projects were just centralized with a skin change, and they still had the nerve to boast about decentralization.
The rainforest system analogy is brilliant; it's understandable even compared to any DAO.
Wait, so how are assets distributed when a temporary autonomous organization dissolves? Is it automatically split based on contribution?
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 01-11 14:49
Contribution as recognition of rights sounds ideal, but I'm afraid it will just become another power game.
---
Fractal governance sounds sexy, but has it really been implemented?
---
The rainforest system is ideal, but who will define the ecological niche?
---
Temporary autonomous organizations plus AI, haha, now capital has a new outlet.
---
Compared to these conceptual hype, I want to see if any projects have actually been implemented.
---
Ownership economy, to put it simply, is still about争夺话语权, a change of form but not substance.
---
Verifiable contribution sounds good, but the key is, after decentralization, who will arbitrate disputes?
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 01-11 14:48
Hi, the Rainforest system sounds good, but when it is actually implemented, who will prevent large investors from colluding to harvest the profits?
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObserver
· 01-11 14:45
Sounds good, but can it really be "effective in real-time" in practice? I always feel like there will still be queues for approval at that time.
The promised transparent traceability, I suspect some node parties are still holding it up.
The Rainforest system sounds romantic, but who will oversee the rats and snakes in the nest?
If this logic really becomes reality, the crypto circle will have another round of hype, haha.
Wait, is "automatic dissolution" truly automatic or forced? The details are full of pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
GasBankrupter
· 01-11 14:41
I like the logic of contribution equaling rights confirmation. It's definitely better than being exploited by big V's now haha.
---
Another temporary autonomous organization... sounds good in theory, but it might take another two years to really implement.
---
The Rainforest System sounds promising, but how do we prevent people from using fake identities to inflate contributions?
---
So, can this mechanism withstand those bizarre attacks on the chain, or is it just another idealistic framework?
---
Haha, isn't this just code as law? But the problem is, code can also have bugs, brother.
---
I just want to know how this verifiable contribution proof is actually implemented. Don’t tell me it’s another pump-and-dump scheme.
---
Fractal governance, where voting power flows with contributions... sounds like another DAO, right? The last DAO I participated in, I still haven't figured out how voting works.
---
The Rainforest System is very romantic, but in reality, isn't it just big whales monopolizing everything?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatorFlash
· 01-11 14:38
Hmm... Fractal governance sounds good, but can this mechanism of automatic power flow really prevent whales from monopolizing? I feel like it's another form of covert centralization.
The true essence of ownership economy is not about building isolated islands.
A new logic of collaboration is emerging — every contribution you make is directly embedded into the protocol itself, rather than being swallowed up by a central authority.
How does it work specifically?
🧬 **Contribution equals rights confirmation**. Verified contributions automatically confirm rights, no approval needed, no waiting, and they take effect in real-time.
🤖 **Dynamic power distribution**. Fractal governance mechanisms allow voting power to flow naturally with contributions. More contributions = greater say, with transparent and traceable rules.
🚀 **Temporary autonomous organizations**. Imagine future teams like this: you, an AI agent, and community contributors form a temporary team to complete a task. Once the task is done, the organization dissolves automatically, and assets are settled immediately, with no redundant steps.
This is not about building a walled garden — setting strict limits on who can enter and who cannot. We aim to cultivate a rainforest system, where each species can find its ecological niche, resulting in strong vitality and resilience.