If the "Troll" project were to relaunch on Binance Smart Chain, the entire situation would become quite interesting.
First, considerations would include liquidity and the user base. As a public chain ecosystem, BSC has relatively mature ecosystem development, with numerous DeFi and NFT projects, and active user engagement. If "Troll" were to restart on this chain, whether it can attract a new wave of attention depends on the project's own innovations and operational strategies.
Next is the technical aspect. BSC's transaction costs are significantly cheaper compared to Ethereum, which is a benefit for user participation. However, it also means more intense competition—there are already many projects with similar concepts operating on this chain.
Another practical issue is the attitude of existing token holders. A relaunch usually involves some form of redistribution or rule adjustments. Whether this can be accepted by the community will affect the project's reputation and initial enthusiasm.
Overall, relaunching "Troll" on BSC offers opportunities, but the key to success still depends on whether the project team can bring genuine innovation and earn community trust.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseVagrant
· 01-12 04:51
Is this another attempt to harvest the little guys?
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrince
· 01-11 09:03
Trolls are restarting BSC? Long-term holders are probably about to lose their temper, huh.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidated
· 01-11 08:59
Same old story... What more innovation can BSC have?
View OriginalReply0
GamefiEscapeArtist
· 01-11 08:51
Are you trying to cut new leeks again?
Red-chip stocks also want to turn around on BSC, how interesting.
If you don't believe it, then put real money on the line.
Sounds good, but the core issue is whether you can avoid the pitfalls.
Reboot ≈ second harvest? What about long-term holders?
With so many abandoned projects on BSC, why is this one different?
View OriginalReply0
RugDocScientist
· 01-11 08:38
It sounds like yet another "restart" show; there are so many projects like this on BSC that it's getting annoying.
If the "Troll" project were to relaunch on Binance Smart Chain, the entire situation would become quite interesting.
First, considerations would include liquidity and the user base. As a public chain ecosystem, BSC has relatively mature ecosystem development, with numerous DeFi and NFT projects, and active user engagement. If "Troll" were to restart on this chain, whether it can attract a new wave of attention depends on the project's own innovations and operational strategies.
Next is the technical aspect. BSC's transaction costs are significantly cheaper compared to Ethereum, which is a benefit for user participation. However, it also means more intense competition—there are already many projects with similar concepts operating on this chain.
Another practical issue is the attitude of existing token holders. A relaunch usually involves some form of redistribution or rule adjustments. Whether this can be accepted by the community will affect the project's reputation and initial enthusiasm.
Overall, relaunching "Troll" on BSC offers opportunities, but the key to success still depends on whether the project team can bring genuine innovation and earn community trust.