Testing out $AMELIA with some aggressive liquidity pool positioning. Running a 100/5 pool configuration and taking a single-sided SOL exposure. Interesting to see how wide range strategies perform in current market conditions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationKing
· 01-11 04:50
ngl, this 100/5 setup sounds a bit aggressive. Are you really serious about betting on SOL this time...
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPudding
· 01-11 04:50
ngl, is the 100/5 configuration this aggressive? Truly bold. Let's see if the liquidity pool can withstand the market fluctuations this time.
View OriginalReply0
SingleForYears
· 01-11 04:47
Playing such an aggressive configuration of 100/5, are you really that bold?
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictim
· 01-11 04:44
Listen, what is the 100/5 setup betting on? Can SOL really hold on single-handedly? This market trend feels quite fierce.
View OriginalReply0
Layer3Dreamer
· 01-11 04:31
theoretically speaking, if we model this 100/5 configuration as a recursive state verification problem... the asymmetric sol exposure here is basically just cross-rollup liquidity fragmentation in disguise, no?
imagine every lp position had to communicate through a zk-proof bridge—suddenly these wide ranges make way more sense mathematically. this is giving blockchain trilemma energy fr
Testing out $AMELIA with some aggressive liquidity pool positioning. Running a 100/5 pool configuration and taking a single-sided SOL exposure. Interesting to see how wide range strategies perform in current market conditions.