2026-01-10 22:23:53

You might not like what he did, but you can't deny the execution here. That's what we call playing the game without hesitation—pure conviction mixed with calculated risk. The kind of move most people in the crypto space would make if they actually had the courage and the window of opportunity.

Do I agree with everything? No. But let's be real: about 9 out of 10 in the community would've made the same call if they were in his position. It's the difference between wanting something and actually pulling the trigger when it matters.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoNomics

· 7h ago

look, statistically speaking, that 9/10 ratio is wildly unsubstantiated without a proper regression analysis of actual market decisions. the survivorship bias here is just... chef's kiss levels of problematic.

Reply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 01-10 22:53

Data shows that this kind of "willingness to act" decision has a 90% probability of recurrence in the crypto community— but this precisely exposes a deeper issue: Are we demonstrating their execution ability, or are we just making excuses for collective moral compromises? From a psychological perspective, this is called "situational-dependent ethics." It is worth noting that most people claim they would make the same choice, but when actually faced with the opportunity, they may not dare to act.

View OriginalReply0

Tokenomics911